HDV vs. SCZ
HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) and SCZ (iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index, while SCZ is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HDV returned 9.31%/yr vs 8.92%/yr for SCZ. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HDV charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for SCZ.
Performance
HDV vs. SCZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDV achieves a 12.57% return, which is significantly higher than SCZ's 9.50% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HDV having a 9.31% annualized return and SCZ not far behind at 8.92%.
HDV
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- YTD
- 12.57%
- 6M
- 12.67%
- 1Y
- 19.54%
- 3Y*
- 14.97%
- 5Y*
- 10.90%
- 10Y*
- 9.31%
SCZ
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- YTD
- 9.50%
- 6M
- 9.97%
- 1Y
- 24.34%
- 3Y*
- 16.72%
- 5Y*
- 5.65%
- 10Y*
- 8.92%
HDV vs. SCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 12.57% | 11.90% | 14.16% | 1.72% | 7.05% | 19.45% | -6.48% | 20.22% | -3.01% | 13.40% |
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 9.50% | 32.08% | 1.52% | 12.98% | -21.27% | 10.12% | 11.71% | 24.68% | -17.64% | 32.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDV and SCZ is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2011 | 0.62 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HDV and SCZ has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
HDV vs. SCZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HDV
SCZ
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Technology
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
HDV
SCZ
Healthcare
HDV
SCZ
Energy
HDV
SCZ
Consumer Cyclical
HDV
SCZ
Utilities
HDV
SCZ
Communication Services
HDV
SCZ
Financial Services
HDV
SCZ
Industrials
HDV
SCZ
Basic Materials
HDV
SCZ
Technology
HDV
SCZ
Real Estate
HDV
-
SCZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDV vs. SCZ — Risk / Return Rank
HDV
SCZ
HDV vs. SCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) and iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HDV | SCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.30 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | 2.14 | +1.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.39 | 8.07 | +2.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HDV vs. SCZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDV drawdown since its inception was -37.04%, smaller than the maximum SCZ drawdown of -61.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDV and SCZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDV | SCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.04% | -61.86% | +24.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -11.43% | +6.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.49% | -15.06% | +4.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.42% | -36.87% | +21.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.04% | -41.07% | +4.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.65% | -1.84% | -0.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.08% | -13.03% | +9.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 3.02% | -1.13% |
Volatility
HDV vs. SCZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) is 3.37%, while iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) has a volatility of 4.73%. This indicates that HDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDV | SCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.37% | 4.73% | -1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.52% | 12.53% | -5.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.87% | 14.89% | -5.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.80% | 16.79% | -3.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.74% | 17.40% | -1.66% |
HDV vs. SCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than SCZ's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDV vs. SCZ - Dividend Comparison
HDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, less than SCZ's 3.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 2.94% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 3.19% | 3.30% | 3.50% | 2.96% | 1.99% | 2.96% | 1.52% | 3.52% | 2.79% | 2.38% | 2.82% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDV and SCZ have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCZ has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to HDV (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDV dropped -37.04% vs SCZ's -61.86%.
On 10-year performance, HDV leads with 9.31% vs 8.92% for SCZ. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HDV has performed better with a 9.31% return vs 8.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SCZ.
SCZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.19%, compared with 2.94% for HDV.
HDV is categorized as Dividend, while SCZ is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index, while SCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for HDV and 0.40% for SCZ.
HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HDV and SCZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer