HDV vs. QQQ
HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HDV returned 9.36%/yr vs 22.31%/yr for QQQ. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HDV charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
HDV vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDV achieves a 14.11% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.26% return. Over the past 10 years, HDV has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 9.36%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.31% annualized return.
HDV
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- 1.04%
- YTD
- 14.11%
- 6M
- 13.57%
- 1Y
- 20.60%
- 3Y*
- 14.34%
- 5Y*
- 10.83%
- 10Y*
- 9.36%
QQQ
- 1D
- 3.14%
- 1M
- 4.95%
- YTD
- 21.26%
- 6M
- 22.17%
- 1Y
- 41.87%
- 3Y*
- 27.20%
- 5Y*
- 17.59%
- 10Y*
- 22.31%
HDV vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 14.11% | 11.90% | 14.16% | 1.72% | 7.05% | 19.45% | -6.48% | 20.22% | -3.01% | 13.40% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.26% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDV and QQQ is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2011 | 0.51 |
The correlation between HDV and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HDV vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HDV
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Healthcare
Financial Services
Technology
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
HDV
QQQ
Energy
HDV
QQQ
Healthcare
HDV
QQQ
Financial Services
HDV
QQQ
Technology
HDV
QQQ
Utilities
HDV
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
HDV
QQQ
Industrials
HDV
QQQ
Basic Materials
HDV
QQQ
Communication Services
HDV
QQQ
Real Estate
HDV
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDV vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
HDV
QQQ
HDV vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HDV | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.42 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.00 | 3.52 | +0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.07 | 13.12 | -2.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HDV vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDV drawdown since its inception was -37.04%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDV and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDV | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.04% | -82.97% | +45.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -11.96% | +6.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.49% | -22.77% | +12.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.42% | -35.12% | +19.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.04% | -35.12% | -1.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.31% | -0.29% | -1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.08% | -32.75% | +29.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | 3.20% | -1.33% |
Volatility
HDV vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) is 3.28%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 8.14%. This indicates that HDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDV | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.28% | 8.14% | -4.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.53% | 14.12% | -6.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.79% | 17.43% | -7.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.84% | 22.59% | -9.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.74% | 22.41% | -6.67% |
HDV vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HDV vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
HDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 3.56% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDV and QQQ have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (8.14%) compared to HDV (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDV dropped -37.04% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 22.31% vs 9.36% for HDV. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 22.31% return vs 9.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQ.
HDV has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.
HDV is categorized as Dividend, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for HDV and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HDV and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer