HDMV vs. VEA
HDMV (First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF) and VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. HDMV is actively managed, while VEA is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HDMV returned 6.31%/yr vs 9.60%/yr for VEA. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HDMV charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VEA.
Performance
HDMV vs. VEA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDMV achieves a 4.23% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 14.92% return.
HDMV
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- 4.23%
- 6M
- 5.97%
- 1Y
- 9.53%
- 3Y*
- 12.63%
- 5Y*
- 6.31%
- 10Y*
- —
VEA
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- 14.92%
- 6M
- 18.15%
- 1Y
- 32.48%
- 3Y*
- 19.77%
- 5Y*
- 9.60%
- 10Y*
- 10.17%
HDMV vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF | 4.23% | 29.31% | 2.99% | 9.62% | -11.47% | 7.39% | -9.42% | 15.00% | -7.60% | 27.49% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 14.92% | 35.16% | 3.15% | 17.93% | -15.34% | 11.66% | 9.71% | 22.62% | -14.75% | 26.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDMV and VEA is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2016 | 0.87 |
The correlation between HDMV and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
HDMV vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HDMV
VEA
Financial Services
Industrials
Utilities
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
Financial Services
HDMV
VEA
Industrials
HDMV
VEA
Utilities
HDMV
VEA
Real Estate
HDMV
VEA
Consumer Defensive
HDMV
VEA
Communication Services
HDMV
VEA
Healthcare
HDMV
VEA
Consumer Cyclical
HDMV
VEA
Energy
HDMV
VEA
Basic Materials
HDMV
VEA
Technology
HDMV
VEA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDMV vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank
HDMV
VEA
HDMV vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HDMV | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.38 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 2.81 | -1.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.41 | 10.94 | -7.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HDMV | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 2.09 | -1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.58 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.25 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
HDMV vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDMV drawdown since its inception was -32.01%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDMV and VEA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDMV | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.01% | -60.68% | +28.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.73% | -11.63% | +2.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.33% | -13.45% | +3.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.11% | -29.71% | +5.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.05% | -0.90% | -5.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.77% | -13.29% | +6.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 2.98% | -0.18% |
Volatility
HDMV vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) is 3.83%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that HDMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDMV | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.83% | 5.66% | -1.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.38% | 13.32% | -3.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.16% | 15.66% | -4.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.05% | 16.55% | -4.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.24% | 17.36% | -4.12% |
HDMV vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDMV has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDMV vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison
HDMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than VEA's 2.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF | 4.70% | 5.09% | 3.24% | 3.14% | 3.53% | 3.11% | 1.45% | 3.63% | 2.88% | 3.23% | 0.18% | 0.00% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.62% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDMV and VEA have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VEA has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to HDMV (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDMV dropped -32.01% vs VEA's -60.68%.
On 5-year performance, VEA leads with 9.60% vs 6.31% for HDMV. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, HDMV has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VEA has performed better with a 9.60% return vs 6.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for HDMV.
HDMV has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 2.62% for VEA.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for HDMV and 0.03% for VEA.
VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HDMV and VEA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer