PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDMV vs. IEFA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDMV vs. IEFA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDMV achieves a 4.93% return, which is significantly lower than IEFA's 9.71% return.


HDMV

1D
0.18%
1M
-2.26%
YTD
4.93%
6M
6.73%
1Y
9.31%
3Y*
12.88%
5Y*
6.68%
10Y*

IEFA

1D
0.53%
1M
2.89%
YTD
9.71%
6M
12.86%
1Y
21.97%
3Y*
17.03%
5Y*
8.44%
10Y*
9.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDMV vs. IEFA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HDMV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF
4.93%29.31%2.99%9.62%-11.47%7.39%-9.42%15.00%-7.60%27.49%
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
9.71%32.08%3.26%17.95%-15.24%11.63%8.18%22.64%-14.14%26.57%

Correlation

The correlation between HDMV and IEFA is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2016

0.88

The correlation between HDMV and IEFA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

HDMV vs. IEFA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HDMV
IEFA

Financial Services

24.4%
22.5%

Industrials

15.2%
20.1%

Utilities

14.6%
3.6%

Real Estate

13.8%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

13.0%
6.6%

Communication Services

9.4%
4.4%

Healthcare

3.1%
9.5%

Consumer Cyclical

2.7%
8.0%

Energy

1.8%
3.8%

Basic Materials

1.0%
7.0%

Technology

0.9%
10.8%

Financial Services

HDMV
24.4%
IEFA
22.5%

Industrials

HDMV
15.2%
IEFA
20.1%

Utilities

HDMV
14.6%
IEFA
3.6%

Real Estate

HDMV
13.8%
IEFA
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

HDMV
13.0%
IEFA
6.6%

Communication Services

HDMV
9.4%
IEFA
4.4%

Healthcare

HDMV
3.1%
IEFA
9.5%

Consumer Cyclical

HDMV
2.7%
IEFA
8.0%

Energy

HDMV
1.8%
IEFA
3.8%

Basic Materials

HDMV
1.0%
IEFA
7.0%

Technology

HDMV
0.9%
IEFA
10.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDMV vs. IEFA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDMV
HDMV Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
HDMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDMV Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
HDMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDMV Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

IEFA
IEFA Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
IEFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEFA Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
IEFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEFA Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDMV vs. IEFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HDMVIEFADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.84

1.48

-0.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.20

2.13

-0.94

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.27

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

2.03

-0.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.80

7.77

-3.97

HDMV vs. IEFA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDMV Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the IEFA Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDMV and IEFA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HDMVIEFADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

1.48

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.51

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.51

-0.10

Drawdowns

HDMV vs. IEFA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDMV drawdown since its inception was -32.01%, smaller than the maximum IEFA drawdown of -34.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDMV and IEFA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDMVIEFADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.01%

-34.78%

+2.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.73%

-11.50%

+2.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.33%

-13.76%

+3.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.11%

-30.41%

+6.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.41%

-0.42%

-4.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.77%

-6.69%

-0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

3.01%

-0.24%

Volatility

HDMV vs. IEFA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) is 4.08%, while iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) has a volatility of 5.00%. This indicates that HDMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDMVIEFADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

5.00%

-0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.38%

12.41%

-3.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.19%

14.97%

-3.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.05%

16.50%

-4.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.24%

17.30%

-4.06%

HDMV vs. IEFA - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDMV has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than IEFA's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

HDMV vs. IEFA - Dividend Comparison

HDMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, more than IEFA's 3.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HDMV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF
4.67%5.09%3.24%3.14%3.53%3.11%1.45%3.63%2.88%3.23%0.18%0.00%
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
3.24%3.55%3.47%3.20%2.70%3.32%1.90%3.18%3.46%2.57%2.96%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDMV and IEFA have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IEFA has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to HDMV (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDMV dropped -32.01% vs IEFA's -34.78%.

On 5-year performance, IEFA leads with 8.44% vs 6.68% for HDMV. On fees, IEFA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, HDMV has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IEFA has performed better with a 8.44% return vs 6.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IEFA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for HDMV.

HDMV has the higher dividend yield at 4.67%, compared with 3.24% for IEFA.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for HDMV and 0.07% for IEFA.

IEFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDMV and IEFA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer