PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDMV vs. FDT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDMV vs. FDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDMV achieves a 4.93% return, which is significantly lower than FDT's 26.31% return.


HDMV

1D
0.18%
1M
-2.26%
YTD
4.93%
6M
6.73%
1Y
9.31%
3Y*
12.88%
5Y*
6.68%
10Y*

FDT

1D
-0.96%
1M
5.42%
YTD
26.31%
6M
30.28%
1Y
55.30%
3Y*
30.36%
5Y*
12.97%
10Y*
10.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDMV vs. FDT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HDMV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF
4.93%29.31%2.99%9.62%-11.47%7.39%-9.42%15.00%-7.60%27.49%
FDT
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund
26.31%52.21%6.97%15.03%-19.51%11.43%4.29%16.82%-19.98%34.42%

Correlation

The correlation between HDMV and FDT is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2016

0.79

The correlation between HDMV and FDT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

HDMV vs. FDT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HDMV
FDT

Financial Services

24.4%
10.2%

Industrials

15.2%
34.0%

Utilities

14.6%
5.2%

Real Estate

13.8%
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

13.0%
2.8%

Communication Services

9.4%
2.7%

Healthcare

3.1%
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

2.7%
11.5%

Energy

1.8%
9.2%

Basic Materials

1.0%
9.6%

Technology

0.9%
8.1%

Financial Services

HDMV
24.4%
FDT
10.2%

Industrials

HDMV
15.2%
FDT
34.0%

Utilities

HDMV
14.6%
FDT
5.2%

Real Estate

HDMV
13.8%
FDT
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

HDMV
13.0%
FDT
2.8%

Communication Services

HDMV
9.4%
FDT
2.7%

Healthcare

HDMV
3.1%
FDT
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

HDMV
2.7%
FDT
11.5%

Energy

HDMV
1.8%
FDT
9.2%

Basic Materials

HDMV
1.0%
FDT
9.6%

Technology

HDMV
0.9%
FDT
8.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDMV vs. FDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDMV
HDMV Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
HDMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDMV Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
HDMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDMV Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

FDT
FDT Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDT Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDT Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDMV vs. FDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HDMVFDTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.84

3.02

-2.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.20

3.86

-2.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.54

-0.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

4.36

-3.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.80

17.08

-13.28

HDMV vs. FDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDMV Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the FDT Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDMV and FDT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HDMVFDTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

3.02

-2.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.71

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.40

+0.01

Drawdowns

HDMV vs. FDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDMV drawdown since its inception was -32.01%, smaller than the maximum FDT drawdown of -46.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDMV and FDT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDMVFDTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.01%

-46.10%

+14.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.73%

-13.41%

+4.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.33%

-14.29%

+3.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.11%

-33.18%

+9.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.41%

-0.96%

-4.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.77%

-10.78%

+4.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

3.42%

-0.65%

Volatility

HDMV vs. FDT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) is 4.08%, while First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) has a volatility of 7.21%. This indicates that HDMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDMVFDTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

7.21%

-3.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.38%

15.92%

-6.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.19%

18.50%

-7.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.05%

18.24%

-6.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.24%

18.53%

-5.29%

HDMV vs. FDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HDMV and FDT have an expense ratio of 0.80%.


Dividends

HDMV vs. FDT - Dividend Comparison

HDMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, more than FDT's 2.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDT
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund
2.82%3.27%3.89%4.36%2.29%3.80%2.42%2.78%2.13%1.57%1.76%1.83%
HDMV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF
4.67%5.09%3.24%3.14%3.53%3.11%1.45%3.63%2.88%3.23%0.18%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDMV and FDT have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDT has higher volatility (7.21%) compared to HDMV (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDMV dropped -32.01% vs FDT's -46.10%.

On 5-year performance, FDT leads with 12.97% vs 6.68% for HDMV. Both ETFs have the same 0.80% expense ratio. On volatility, HDMV has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDT has performed better with a 12.97% return vs 6.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HDMV and FDT have the same expense ratio: 0.80% per year.

HDMV has the higher dividend yield at 4.67%, compared with 2.82% for FDT.

FDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDMV and FDT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer