HDGE vs. SQLV
HDGE (AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF) and SQLV (Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HDGE is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while SQLV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, HDGE returned -1.94%/yr vs 7.15%/yr for SQLV. At a correlation of -0.70, they often move in opposite directions. HDGE charges 3.36%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SQLV.
Performance
HDGE vs. SQLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDGE achieves a 6.12% return, which is significantly lower than SQLV's 16.34% return.
HDGE
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 6.12%
- 6M
- 6.85%
- 1Y
- 2.56%
- 3Y*
- -4.06%
- 5Y*
- -1.94%
- 10Y*
- -15.19%
SQLV
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 3.63%
- YTD
- 16.34%
- 6M
- 15.01%
- 1Y
- 28.84%
- 3Y*
- 13.42%
- 5Y*
- 7.15%
- 10Y*
- —
HDGE vs. SQLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF | 6.12% | 1.50% | -8.01% | -26.98% | 16.59% | -18.61% | -43.47% | -36.27% | 7.53% | -9.05% |
SQLV Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF | 16.34% | 2.50% | 4.76% | 21.21% | -12.86% | 37.14% | 7.13% | 17.41% | -10.55% | 8.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDGE and SQLV is -0.84, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2017 | -0.70 |
The correlation between HDGE and SQLV shifts across timeframes, from -0.86 (3 years) to -0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HDGE vs. SQLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HDGE
SQLV
Utilities
-
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Real Estate
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Financial Services
Utilities
HDGE
-
SQLV
Healthcare
HDGE
SQLV
Basic Materials
HDGE
SQLV
Energy
HDGE
SQLV
Consumer Defensive
HDGE
SQLV
Communication Services
HDGE
SQLV
Real Estate
HDGE
SQLV
Industrials
HDGE
SQLV
Consumer Cyclical
HDGE
SQLV
Technology
HDGE
SQLV
Financial Services
HDGE
SQLV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDGE vs. SQLV — Risk / Return Rank
HDGE
SQLV
HDGE vs. SQLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) and Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HDGE | SQLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.28 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.21 | 3.28 | -3.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.43 | 9.82 | -9.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HDGE vs. SQLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDGE drawdown since its inception was -93.88%, which is greater than SQLV's maximum drawdown of -48.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDGE and SQLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDGE | SQLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.88% | -48.34% | -45.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.26% | -8.84% | -3.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.46% | -26.86% | -2.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.97% | -26.86% | -16.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.03% | -0.96% | -92.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.17% | -8.90% | -61.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.97% | 2.95% | +3.02% |
Volatility
HDGE vs. SQLV - Volatility Comparison
AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) has a higher volatility of 5.85% compared to Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV) at 4.55%. This indicates that HDGE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SQLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDGE | SQLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.85% | 4.55% | +1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.98% | 11.56% | +1.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.33% | 17.69% | +0.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.19% | 20.98% | +3.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.50% | 23.32% | +0.18% |
HDGE vs. SQLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDGE has a 3.36% expense ratio, which is higher than SQLV's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDGE vs. SQLV - Dividend Comparison
HDGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, more than SQLV's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF | 3.29% | 3.50% | 7.83% | 9.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SQLV Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF | 1.01% | 1.15% | 1.11% | 1.09% | 1.24% | 1.12% | 1.22% | 1.20% | 1.08% | 0.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDGE and SQLV have a correlation of -0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HDGE has higher volatility (5.85%) compared to SQLV (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDGE dropped -93.88% vs SQLV's -48.34%.
On 5-year performance, SQLV leads with 7.15% vs -1.94% for HDGE. On fees, SQLV is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, SQLV has been the lower-risk option at 4.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SQLV has performed better with a 7.15% return vs -1.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SQLV is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 3.36% for HDGE.
HDGE has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 1.01% for SQLV.
HDGE is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SQLV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 3.36% for HDGE and 0.60% for SQLV.
SQLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HDGE and SQLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer