HDGE vs. QQQM
HDGE (AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HDGE is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. HDGE is actively managed, while QQQM is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HDGE returned -5.22%/yr vs 14.31%/yr for QQQM. Their -0.62 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. HDGE charges 3.36%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.
Performance
HDGE vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDGE achieves a -5.56% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 12.29% return.
HDGE
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -5.26%
- 6M
- -7.86%
- YTD
- -5.56%
- 1Y
- -9.67%
- 3Y*
- -3.25%
- 5Y*
- -5.22%
- 10Y*
- -15.39%
- ALL TIME*
- -15.48%
QQQM
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- -3.45%
- 6M
- 10.92%
- YTD
- 12.29%
- 1Y
- 24.86%
- 3Y*
- 22.37%
- 5Y*
- 14.31%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.51%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.40M | $1.05M | $1.06M | |
| $962.22M | $908.74M | $1.19B |
HDGE vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF | -5.56% | 1.50% | -8.01% | -26.98% | 16.59% | -18.61% | -27.51% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 12.29% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDGE and QQQM is -0.31, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020 | -0.62 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between HDGE and QQQM has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.62 to -0.31, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
HDGE vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HDGE
QQQM
Utilities
-
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Real Estate
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Utilities
HDGE
-
QQQM
Healthcare
HDGE
QQQM
Basic Materials
HDGE
QQQM
Energy
HDGE
QQQM
Communication Services
HDGE
QQQM
Consumer Defensive
HDGE
QQQM
Industrials
HDGE
QQQM
Real Estate
HDGE
QQQM
Financial Services
HDGE
QQQM
Consumer Cyclical
HDGE
QQQM
Technology
HDGE
QQQM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDGE vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
HDGE
QQQM
HDGE vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HDGE | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.21 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.45 | 1.88 | -2.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.23 | 6.01 | -7.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HDGE vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDGE drawdown since its inception was -93.98%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDGE and QQQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDGE | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.98% | -35.04% | -58.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.34% | -11.96% | -8.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.63% | -22.70% | -7.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.92% | -35.04% | -8.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -82.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.80% | -7.69% | -86.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.33% | -8.15% | -62.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.44% | 3.74% | +3.70% |
Volatility
HDGE vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) has a higher volatility of 8.05% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 6.83%. This indicates that HDGE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDGE | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.05% | 6.83% | +1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.10% | 15.91% | -0.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.26% | 19.24% | +0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.40% | 22.74% | +1.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.53% | 22.32% | +1.21% |
HDGE vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDGE has a 3.36% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDGE vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
HDGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, more than QQQM's 0.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF | 3.70% | 3.50% | 7.83% | 9.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.22% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.46% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDGE and QQQM have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HDGE has higher volatility (8.05%) compared to QQQM (6.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDGE dropped -93.98% vs QQQM's -35.04%.
On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 14.31% vs -5.22% for HDGE. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QQQM has been the lower-risk option at 6.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 14.31% return vs -5.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 3.36% for HDGE.
HDGE has the higher dividend yield at 3.70%, compared with 0.46% for QQQM.
HDGE is categorized as Inverse Equities, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 3.36% for HDGE and 0.15% for QQQM.
QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HDGE and QQQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer