HDGE vs. QQQM
HDGE (AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HDGE is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. HDGE is actively managed, while QQQM is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HDGE returned -3.57%/yr vs 18.52%/yr for QQQM. At a correlation of -0.65, they often move in opposite directions. HDGE charges 3.36%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.
Performance
HDGE vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDGE achieves a 2.81% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 21.64% return.
HDGE
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- -2.26%
- YTD
- 2.81%
- 6M
- 1.13%
- 1Y
- -4.58%
- 3Y*
- -5.86%
- 5Y*
- -3.57%
- 10Y*
- -14.98%
QQQM
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 10.70%
- YTD
- 21.64%
- 6M
- 20.29%
- 1Y
- 43.37%
- 3Y*
- 28.98%
- 5Y*
- 18.52%
- 10Y*
- —
HDGE vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF | 2.81% | 1.50% | -8.01% | -26.98% | 16.59% | -18.61% | -29.37% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 21.64% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDGE and QQQM is -0.47, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020 | -0.65 |
The correlation between HDGE and QQQM shifts across timeframes, from -0.67 (5 years) to -0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HDGE vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HDGE
QQQM
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Technology
Utilities
HDGE
-
QQQM
Basic Materials
HDGE
QQQM
Energy
HDGE
QQQM
Communication Services
HDGE
QQQM
Healthcare
HDGE
QQQM
Consumer Defensive
HDGE
QQQM
Real Estate
HDGE
QQQM
Industrials
HDGE
QQQM
Consumer Cyclical
HDGE
QQQM
Financial Services
HDGE
QQQM
Technology
HDGE
QQQM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDGE vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
HDGE
QQQM
HDGE vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HDGE | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | 2.74 | -2.99 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | 3.56 | -3.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.47 | -0.50 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.33 | 3.72 | -4.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.60 | 14.29 | -14.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HDGE | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 | 2.74 | -2.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.15 | 0.84 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.68 | 0.85 | -1.53 |
Drawdowns
HDGE vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDGE drawdown since its inception was -93.88%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDGE and QQQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDGE | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.88% | -35.04% | -58.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.26% | -11.96% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.46% | -22.70% | -6.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.97% | -35.04% | -7.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.25% | 0.00% | -93.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.11% | -8.26% | -61.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.77% | 3.11% | +3.66% |
Volatility
HDGE vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) has a higher volatility of 6.34% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 4.47%. This indicates that HDGE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDGE | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.34% | 4.47% | +1.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.56% | 12.06% | +0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.16% | 15.92% | +2.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.16% | 22.24% | +1.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.55% | 22.13% | +1.42% |
HDGE vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDGE has a 3.36% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDGE vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
HDGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, more than QQQM's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF | 3.40% | 3.50% | 7.83% | 9.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.22% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDGE and QQQM have a correlation of -0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HDGE has higher volatility (6.34%) compared to QQQM (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDGE dropped -93.88% vs QQQM's -35.04%.
On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 18.52% vs -3.57% for HDGE. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QQQM has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 18.52% return vs -3.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 3.36% for HDGE.
HDGE has the higher dividend yield at 3.40%, compared with 0.41% for QQQM.
HDGE is categorized as Inverse Equities, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 3.36% for HDGE and 0.15% for QQQM.
QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HDGE and QQQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer