PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDGE vs. QQQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HDGE vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HDGE vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HDGE
AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF
11.86%1.50%-8.01%-26.98%16.59%-18.61%-29.37%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
-4.75%20.85%25.68%55.01%-32.52%27.45%6.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDGE achieves a 11.86% return, which is significantly higher than QQQM's -4.75% return.


HDGE

1D
-0.17%
1M
4.07%
YTD
11.86%
6M
13.54%
1Y
4.31%
3Y*
-4.82%
5Y*
-2.70%
10Y*
-14.58%

QQQM

1D
1.24%
1M
-3.78%
YTD
-4.75%
6M
-2.87%
1Y
24.28%
3Y*
22.91%
5Y*
13.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HDGE vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDGE has a 3.36% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HDGE vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDGE
HDGE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
HDGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDGE Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
HDGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDGE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDGE vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HDGEQQQMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.22

1.09

-0.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.45

1.68

-1.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.24

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.21

2.02

-1.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.30

7.35

-7.05

HDGE vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDGE Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDGE and QQQM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HDGEQQQMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

1.09

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

0.60

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.67

0.64

-1.30

Correlation

The correlation between HDGE and QQQM is -0.66. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

HDGE vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

HDGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than QQQM's 0.53% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
HDGE
AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF
3.12%3.50%7.83%9.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.22%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.53%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%0.00%

Drawdowns

HDGE vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDGE drawdown since its inception was -93.88%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDGE and QQQM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HDGEQQQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.88%

-35.04%

-58.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.63%

-12.55%

-7.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.97%

-35.04%

-7.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.66%

-7.86%

-84.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.85%

-8.47%

-61.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.54%

3.44%

+10.10%

Volatility

HDGE vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) is 4.49%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 6.58%. This indicates that HDGE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HDGEQQQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

6.58%

-2.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.17%

12.79%

-0.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.95%

22.45%

-2.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.95%

22.24%

+1.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.51%

22.26%

+1.25%