HDGE vs. BIS
HDGE (AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF) and BIS (ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology) are both exchange-traded funds - HDGE is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while BIS is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (-200%). HDGE is actively managed, while BIS is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HDGE returned -14.98%/yr vs -23.05%/yr for BIS. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HDGE charges 3.36%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BIS.
Performance
HDGE vs. BIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDGE achieves a 2.81% return, which is significantly higher than BIS's -2.81% return. Over the past 10 years, HDGE has outperformed BIS with an annualized return of -14.98%, while BIS has yielded a comparatively lower -23.05% annualized return.
HDGE
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- -2.26%
- YTD
- 2.81%
- 6M
- 1.13%
- 1Y
- -4.58%
- 3Y*
- -5.86%
- 5Y*
- -3.57%
- 10Y*
- -14.98%
BIS
- 1D
- 6.03%
- 1M
- 2.68%
- YTD
- -2.81%
- 6M
- -4.39%
- 1Y
- -48.69%
- 3Y*
- -20.45%
- 5Y*
- -14.25%
- 10Y*
- -23.05%
HDGE vs. BIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF | 2.81% | 1.50% | -8.01% | -26.98% | 16.59% | -18.61% | -43.47% | -36.27% | 7.53% | -15.24% |
BIS ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology | -2.81% | -45.95% | 4.79% | -6.54% | -2.14% | -14.74% | -56.01% | -41.01% | 5.14% | -36.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDGE and BIS is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2011 | 0.58 |
The correlation between HDGE and BIS shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDGE vs. BIS — Risk / Return Rank
HDGE
BIS
HDGE vs. BIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) and ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology (BIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HDGE | BIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | -1.24 | +0.98 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | -1.94 | +1.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 0.79 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.33 | -0.91 | +0.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.60 | -1.25 | +0.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HDGE | BIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 | -1.24 | +0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.15 | -0.33 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.64 | -0.50 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.68 | -0.67 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
HDGE vs. BIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDGE drawdown since its inception was -93.88%, smaller than the maximum BIS drawdown of -99.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDGE and BIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDGE | BIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.88% | -99.87% | +5.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.26% | -54.50% | +42.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.46% | -66.87% | +37.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.97% | -74.80% | +31.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.69% | -95.25% | +11.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.25% | -99.85% | +6.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.11% | -90.03% | +19.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.77% | 40.33% | -33.56% |
Volatility
HDGE vs. BIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) is 6.34%, while ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology (BIS) has a volatility of 13.78%. This indicates that HDGE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDGE | BIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.34% | 13.78% | -7.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.56% | 31.09% | -18.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.16% | 39.63% | -21.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.16% | 43.70% | -19.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.55% | 46.36% | -22.81% |
HDGE vs. BIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDGE has a 3.36% expense ratio, which is higher than BIS's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDGE vs. BIS - Dividend Comparison
HDGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, less than BIS's 4.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIS ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology | 4.74% | 5.25% | 3.73% | 1.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.45% | 2.11% | 0.37% |
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF | 3.40% | 3.50% | 7.83% | 9.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.22% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDGE and BIS have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BIS has higher volatility (13.78%) compared to HDGE (6.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDGE dropped -93.88% vs BIS's -99.87%.
On 10-year performance, HDGE leads with -14.98% vs -23.05% for BIS. On fees, BIS is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, HDGE has been the lower-risk option at 6.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HDGE has performed better with a -14.98% return vs -23.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BIS is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 3.36% for HDGE.
BIS has the higher dividend yield at 4.74%, compared with 3.40% for HDGE.
HDGE is categorized as Inverse Equities, while BIS is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 3.36% for HDGE and 0.95% for BIS.
HDGE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.25 vs -1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HDGE and BIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer