PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDGE vs. QPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDGE vs. QPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) and AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDGE achieves a 6.12% return, which is significantly lower than QPX's 7.30% return.


HDGE

1D
-0.47%
1M
0.12%
YTD
6.12%
6M
6.85%
1Y
2.56%
3Y*
-4.06%
5Y*
-1.94%
10Y*
-15.19%

QPX

1D
-2.08%
1M
-0.66%
YTD
7.30%
6M
5.43%
1Y
26.59%
3Y*
19.68%
5Y*
11.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDGE vs. QPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HDGE
AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF
6.12%1.50%-8.01%-26.98%16.59%-18.61%0.00%
QPX
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF
7.30%24.12%17.28%44.63%-30.90%22.29%-0.31%

Correlation

The correlation between HDGE and QPX is -0.50, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2020

-0.70

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between HDGE and QPX has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.70 to -0.50, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDGE vs. QPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDGE
HDGE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
HDGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDGE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
HDGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDGE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

QPX
QPX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
QPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
QPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
QPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
QPX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDGE vs. QPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) and AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HDGEQPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.31

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.21

2.31

-2.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.43

8.92

-8.49

HDGE vs. QPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDGE Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the QPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDGE and QPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HDGE vs. QPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDGE drawdown since its inception was -93.88%, which is greater than QPX's maximum drawdown of -34.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDGE and QPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDGEQPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.88%

-34.74%

-59.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.26%

-11.56%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.46%

-17.89%

-11.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.97%

-34.74%

-8.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.03%

-3.86%

-89.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-70.17%

-8.02%

-62.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.97%

2.99%

+2.98%

Volatility

HDGE vs. QPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) is 5.85%, while AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) has a volatility of 6.59%. This indicates that HDGE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDGEQPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.85%

6.59%

-0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.98%

12.42%

+0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.33%

15.13%

+3.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.19%

20.09%

+4.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.50%

20.07%

+3.43%

HDGE vs. QPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDGE has a 3.36% expense ratio, which is higher than QPX's 1.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

HDGE vs. QPX - Dividend Comparison

HDGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, while QPX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
HDGE
AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF
3.29%3.50%7.83%9.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.22%
QPX
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDGE and QPX have a correlation of -0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QPX has higher volatility (6.59%) compared to HDGE (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDGE dropped -93.88% vs QPX's -34.74%.

On 5-year performance, QPX leads with 11.40% vs -1.94% for HDGE. On fees, QPX is cheaper at 1.46% per year. On volatility, HDGE has been the lower-risk option at 5.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QPX has performed better with a 11.40% return vs -1.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QPX is cheaper with a 1.46% expense ratio, compared with 3.36% for HDGE.

HDGE has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 0.00% for QPX.

HDGE is categorized as Inverse Equities, while QPX is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 3.36% for HDGE and 1.46% for QPX.

QPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDGE and QPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer