HDGE vs. GK

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

HDGE (AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF) and GK (AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HDGE is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while GK is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, HDGE returned -4.06%/yr vs 18.34%/yr for GK. At a correlation of -0.70, they often move in opposite directions. HDGE charges 3.36%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GK.

Performance

HDGE vs. GK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) and AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDGE achieves a 6.12% return, which is significantly lower than GK's 13.03% return.

HDGE

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 0.12%
• YTD: 6.12%
• 6M: 6.85%
• 1Y: 2.56%
• 3Y*: -4.06%
• 5Y*: -1.94%
• 10Y*: -15.19%

GK

• 1D: -2.88%
• 1M: 1.29%
• YTD: 13.03%
• 6M: 11.47%
• 1Y: 27.18%
• 3Y*: 18.34%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDGE vs. GK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF	6.12%	1.50%	-8.01%	-26.98%	16.59%	7.87%
GK AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF	13.03%	17.78%	20.10%	21.19%	-42.76%	4.61%

Correlation

The correlation between HDGE and GK is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2021	-0.70

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between HDGE and GK has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.70 to -0.35, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

HDGE vs. GK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HDGE	GK
Utilities	-	5.2%
Healthcare	-1.2%	8.0%
Basic Materials	-1.3%	-
Energy	-2.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	-3.0%	2.1%
Communication Services	-6.1%	16.3%
Real Estate	-8.6%	-
Industrials	-13.9%	16.9%
Consumer Cyclical	-18.1%	2.9%
Technology	-19.5%	37.9%
Financial Services	-25.3%	6.9%

Return for Risk

HDGE vs. GK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDGE

HDGE Risk / Return Rank: 10
HDGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
HDGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
HDGE Omega Ratio Rank: 10
HDGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
HDGE Martin Ratio Rank: 11

GK

GK Risk / Return Rank: 42
GK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
GK Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
GK Omega Ratio Rank: 43
GK Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
GK Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDGE vs. GK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) and AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HDGE	GK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.14	1.46	-1.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.33	2.05	-1.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.26	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.21	1.80	-1.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.43	6.74	-6.31

HDGE vs. GK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDGE Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the GK Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDGE and GK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HDGE vs. GK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDGE drawdown since its inception was -93.88%, which is greater than GK's maximum drawdown of -47.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDGE and GK.

Drawdown Indicators

	HDGE	GK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.88%	-47.72%	-46.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.26%	-15.13%	+2.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.46%	-23.62%	-5.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.97%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-83.69%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-93.03%	-4.03%	-89.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-70.17%	-23.77%	-46.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.97%	4.04%	+1.93%

Volatility

HDGE vs. GK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) is 5.85%, while AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) has a volatility of 8.10%. This indicates that HDGE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HDGE	GK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.85%	8.10%	-2.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.98%	15.03%	-2.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.33%	18.71%	-0.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.19%	24.02%	+0.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.50%	24.02%	-0.52%

HDGE vs. GK - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDGE has a 3.36% expense ratio, which is higher than GK's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

HDGE vs. GK - Dividend Comparison

HDGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, more than GK's 0.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GK AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF	0.07%	0.08%	0.00%	0.13%	1.30%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF	3.29%	3.50%	7.83%	9.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HDGE and GK in my portfolio?

HDGE and GK have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HDGE or GK?

GK has higher volatility (8.10%) compared to HDGE (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDGE dropped -93.88% vs GK's -47.72%.

Which ETF is better, HDGE or GK?

On 3-year performance, GK leads with 18.34% vs -4.06% for HDGE. On fees, GK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, HDGE has been the lower-risk option at 5.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HDGE or GK?

Over the 3-year period, GK has performed better with a 18.34% return vs -4.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HDGE or GK?

GK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 3.36% for HDGE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HDGE or GK?

HDGE has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 0.07% for GK.

What is the main difference between HDGE and GK?

HDGE is categorized as Inverse Equities, while GK is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 3.36% for HDGE and 0.75% for GK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.