HDGE vs. CWS
HDGE (AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF) and CWS (AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HDGE is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while CWS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, HDGE returned -2.89%/yr vs 8.16%/yr for CWS. At a correlation of -0.64, they often move in opposite directions. HDGE charges 3.36%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for CWS.
Performance
HDGE vs. CWS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDGE achieves a 5.43% return, which is significantly higher than CWS's -1.80% return.
HDGE
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- -2.09%
- YTD
- 5.43%
- 6M
- 5.59%
- 1Y
- -0.65%
- 3Y*
- -5.06%
- 5Y*
- -2.89%
- 10Y*
- -14.77%
CWS
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- YTD
- -1.80%
- 6M
- -1.31%
- 1Y
- -0.99%
- 3Y*
- 10.25%
- 5Y*
- 8.16%
- 10Y*
- —
HDGE vs. CWS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF | 5.43% | 1.50% | -8.01% | -26.98% | 16.59% | -18.61% | -43.47% | -36.27% | 7.53% | -15.24% |
CWS AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF | -1.80% | 6.43% | 9.82% | 25.06% | -10.42% | 22.20% | 17.12% | 30.97% | -6.46% | 20.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDGE and CWS is -0.63, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016 | -0.64 |
The correlation between HDGE and CWS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.69 to -0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
HDGE vs. CWS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HDGE
CWS
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Technology
Utilities
HDGE
-
CWS
Basic Materials
HDGE
CWS
-
Energy
HDGE
CWS
-
Communication Services
HDGE
CWS
-
Healthcare
HDGE
CWS
Consumer Defensive
HDGE
CWS
Real Estate
HDGE
CWS
-
Industrials
HDGE
CWS
Consumer Cyclical
HDGE
CWS
Financial Services
HDGE
CWS
Technology
HDGE
CWS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDGE vs. CWS — Risk / Return Rank
HDGE
CWS
HDGE vs. CWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) and AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HDGE | CWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.00 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.05 | -0.08 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.11 | -0.22 | +0.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HDGE | CWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 | -0.08 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | 0.52 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.67 | 0.67 | -1.34 |
Drawdowns
HDGE vs. CWS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDGE drawdown since its inception was -93.88%, which is greater than CWS's maximum drawdown of -33.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDGE and CWS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDGE | CWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.88% | -33.82% | -60.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.26% | -11.92% | -0.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.46% | -16.56% | -12.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.97% | -24.87% | -18.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.08% | -6.21% | -86.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.11% | -4.54% | -65.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.16% | 4.61% | +1.55% |
Volatility
HDGE vs. CWS - Volatility Comparison
AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) has a higher volatility of 6.41% compared to AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) at 3.27%. This indicates that HDGE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDGE | CWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.41% | 3.27% | +3.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.81% | 10.29% | +2.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.33% | 13.28% | +5.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.18% | 15.66% | +8.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.56% | 16.91% | +6.65% |
HDGE vs. CWS - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDGE has a 3.36% expense ratio, which is higher than CWS's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDGE vs. CWS - Dividend Comparison
HDGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, more than CWS's 0.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWS AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF | 0.31% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 0.25% | 0.50% | 0.16% | 0.27% | 0.39% | 2.07% | 0.29% | 0.03% |
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF | 3.32% | 3.50% | 7.83% | 9.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDGE and CWS have a correlation of -0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HDGE has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to CWS (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDGE dropped -93.88% vs CWS's -33.82%.
On 5-year performance, CWS leads with 8.16% vs -2.89% for HDGE. On fees, CWS is cheaper at 0.77% per year. On volatility, CWS has been the lower-risk option at 3.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, CWS has performed better with a 8.16% return vs -2.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CWS is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 3.36% for HDGE.
HDGE has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 0.31% for CWS.
HDGE is categorized as Inverse Equities, while CWS is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 3.36% for HDGE and 0.77% for CWS.
HDGE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.04 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HDGE and CWS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer