HDGE vs. CWS
HDGE (AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF) and CWS (AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HDGE is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while CWS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, HDGE returned -5.88%/yr vs 8.67%/yr for CWS. Their -0.64 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. HDGE charges 3.36%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for CWS.
Performance
HDGE vs. CWS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDGE achieves a -7.47% return, which is significantly lower than CWS's 4.18% return.
HDGE
- 1D
- -2.03%
- 1M
- -7.18%
- 6M
- -9.45%
- YTD
- -7.47%
- 1Y
- -11.50%
- 3Y*
- -4.40%
- 5Y*
- -5.88%
- 10Y*
- -15.33%
- ALL TIME*
- -15.58%
CWS
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 4.21%
- 6M
- 3.86%
- YTD
- 4.18%
- 1Y
- 5.45%
- 3Y*
- 9.55%
- 5Y*
- 8.67%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.73%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $278.34K | $348.09K | $721.15K | |
| $1.39M | $1.04M | $1.07M |
HDGE vs. CWS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF | -7.47% | 1.50% | -8.01% | -26.98% | 16.59% | -18.61% | -43.47% | -36.27% | 7.53% | -15.24% |
CWS AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF | 4.18% | 6.43% | 9.82% | 25.06% | -10.42% | 22.20% | 17.12% | 30.97% | -6.46% | 20.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDGE and CWS is -0.60, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2016 | -0.64 |
The correlation between HDGE and CWS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.69 to -0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
HDGE vs. CWS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HDGE
CWS
Utilities
-
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Utilities
HDGE
-
CWS
Healthcare
HDGE
CWS
Basic Materials
HDGE
CWS
-
Energy
HDGE
CWS
-
Communication Services
HDGE
CWS
-
Consumer Defensive
HDGE
CWS
Industrials
HDGE
CWS
Real Estate
HDGE
CWS
-
Financial Services
HDGE
CWS
Consumer Cyclical
HDGE
CWS
Technology
HDGE
CWS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDGE vs. CWS — Risk / Return Rank
HDGE
CWS
HDGE vs. CWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) and AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HDGE | CWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.08 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.57 | 0.46 | -1.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.56 | 1.16 | -2.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HDGE vs. CWS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDGE drawdown since its inception was -93.98%, which is greater than CWS's maximum drawdown of -33.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDGE and CWS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDGE | CWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.98% | -33.82% | -60.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.34% | -11.92% | -8.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.63% | -16.56% | -14.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.92% | -24.87% | -19.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -82.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.92% | -0.50% | -93.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.34% | -4.54% | -65.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.55% | 4.69% | +2.86% |
Volatility
HDGE vs. CWS - Volatility Comparison
AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) has a higher volatility of 8.15% compared to AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) at 3.44%. This indicates that HDGE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDGE | CWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.15% | 3.44% | +4.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.22% | 10.26% | +4.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.33% | 13.50% | +5.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.42% | 15.70% | +8.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.54% | 16.84% | +6.70% |
HDGE vs. CWS - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDGE has a 3.36% expense ratio, which is higher than CWS's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDGE vs. CWS - Dividend Comparison
HDGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, more than CWS's 0.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWS AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF | 0.29% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 0.25% | 0.50% | 0.16% | 0.27% | 0.39% | 2.07% | 0.29% | 0.03% |
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF | 3.78% | 3.50% | 7.83% | 9.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDGE and CWS have a correlation of -0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HDGE has higher volatility (8.15%) compared to CWS (3.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDGE dropped -93.98% vs CWS's -33.82%.
On 5-year performance, CWS leads with 8.67% vs -5.88% for HDGE. On fees, CWS is cheaper at 0.77% per year. On volatility, CWS has been the lower-risk option at 3.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, CWS has performed better with a 8.67% return vs -5.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CWS is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 3.36% for HDGE.
HDGE has the higher dividend yield at 3.78%, compared with 0.29% for CWS.
HDGE is categorized as Inverse Equities, while CWS is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 3.36% for HDGE and 0.77% for CWS.
CWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.41 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HDGE and CWS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer