PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HCOW vs. SPYV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HCOW vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF (HCOW) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCOW achieves a 4.48% return, which is significantly lower than SPYV's 7.46% return.


HCOW

1D
-0.36%
1M
3.03%
YTD
4.48%
6M
4.26%
1Y
21.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPYV

1D
-0.36%
1M
2.22%
YTD
7.46%
6M
7.77%
1Y
21.26%
3Y*
15.72%
5Y*
10.68%
10Y*
11.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HCOW vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HCOW
Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF
4.48%5.76%7.63%6.44%
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
7.46%13.18%12.24%10.14%

Correlation

The correlation between HCOW and SPYV is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2023

0.80

The correlation between HCOW and SPYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

HCOW vs. SPYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HCOW
SPYV

Technology

21.0%
21.2%

Industrials

18.7%
10.6%

Financial Services

17.2%
14.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
10.9%

Energy

8.2%
7.4%

Healthcare

8.0%
11.6%

Basic Materials

6.0%
3.4%

Communication Services

4.7%
3.2%

Utilities

2.8%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
9.2%

Real Estate

-

3.3%

Technology

HCOW
21.0%
SPYV
21.2%

Industrials

HCOW
18.7%
SPYV
10.6%

Financial Services

HCOW
17.2%
SPYV
14.7%

Consumer Cyclical

HCOW
10.9%
SPYV
10.9%

Energy

HCOW
8.2%
SPYV
7.4%

Healthcare

HCOW
8.0%
SPYV
11.6%

Basic Materials

HCOW
6.0%
SPYV
3.4%

Communication Services

HCOW
4.7%
SPYV
3.2%

Utilities

HCOW
2.8%
SPYV
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

HCOW
2.4%
SPYV
9.2%

Real Estate

HCOW

-

SPYV
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HCOW vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HCOW
HCOW Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
HCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
HCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
HCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
HCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYV
SPYV Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SPYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYV Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYV Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HCOW vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF (HCOW) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HCOWSPYVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.39

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

3.43

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.15

13.16

-2.01

HCOW vs. SPYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HCOW Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the SPYV Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCOW and SPYV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HCOWSPYVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

2.17

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.42

+0.10

Drawdowns

HCOW vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCOW drawdown since its inception was -24.15%, smaller than the maximum SPYV drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCOW and SPYV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HCOWSPYVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.15%

-58.45%

+34.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.29%

-6.22%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-0.57%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.88%

-8.72%

+3.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

1.62%

+0.33%

Volatility

HCOW vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF (HCOW) has a higher volatility of 3.63% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) at 1.98%. This indicates that HCOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HCOWSPYVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.63%

1.98%

+1.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.74%

7.04%

+1.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.89%

9.84%

+4.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.60%

14.40%

+3.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.60%

16.94%

+0.66%

HCOW vs. SPYV - Expense Ratio Comparison

HCOW has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

HCOW vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison

HCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.73%, more than SPYV's 1.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HCOW
Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF
11.73%10.88%8.13%1.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
1.70%1.77%2.29%1.75%2.22%2.10%2.38%2.25%2.97%2.77%2.39%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


HCOW and SPYV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HCOW has higher volatility (3.63%) compared to SPYV (1.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HCOW dropped -24.15% vs SPYV's -58.45%.

On 1-year performance, HCOW leads with 21.68% vs 21.26% for SPYV. On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 1.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HCOW has performed better with a 21.68% return vs 21.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for HCOW.

HCOW has the higher dividend yield at 11.73%, compared with 1.70% for SPYV.

HCOW is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SPYV is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for HCOW and 0.04% for SPYV.

SPYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HCOW and SPYV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer