HCOW vs. COWS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HCOW (Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF) and COWS (Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HCOW is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Amplify, while COWS is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Kelly US Cash Flow Dividend Leaders Index. HCOW is actively managed, while COWS is passively managed. Over the past year, HCOW returned 21.68% vs 30.18% for COWS. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. HCOW charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for COWS.

Performance

HCOW vs. COWS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF (HCOW) and Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF (COWS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCOW achieves a 4.48% return, which is significantly lower than COWS's 9.22% return.

HCOW

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 3.03%
• YTD: 4.48%
• 6M: 4.26%
• 1Y: 21.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COWS

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: 5.01%
• YTD: 9.22%
• 6M: 9.70%
• 1Y: 30.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HCOW vs. COWS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
HCOW Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF	4.48%	5.76%	7.63%	6.44%
COWS Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF	9.22%	15.29%	11.08%	10.60%

Correlation

The correlation between HCOW and COWS is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2023	0.96

The correlation between HCOW and COWS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

HCOW vs. COWS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HCOW	COWS
Technology	21.0%	21.0%
Industrials	18.7%	18.7%
Financial Services	17.2%	17.2%
Consumer Cyclical	10.9%	10.9%
Energy	8.2%	8.2%
Healthcare	8.0%	8.0%
Basic Materials	6.0%	6.0%
Communication Services	4.7%	4.7%
Utilities	2.8%	2.8%
Consumer Defensive	2.4%	2.4%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

HCOW vs. COWS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HCOW

HCOW Risk / Return Rank: 53
HCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
HCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
HCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 44
HCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
HCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 62

COWS

COWS Risk / Return Rank: 65
COWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
COWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
COWS Omega Ratio Rank: 53
COWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
COWS Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HCOW vs. COWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF (HCOW) and Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF (COWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HCOW	COWS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	1.88	-0.31
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.35	2.76	-0.41
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.33	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.46	4.71	-1.25
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.15	14.35	-3.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HCOW vs. COWS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HCOW Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the COWS Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCOW and COWS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HCOW	COWS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.57	1.88	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.90	-0.38

Drawdowns

HCOW vs. COWS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCOW drawdown since its inception was -24.15%, roughly equal to the maximum COWS drawdown of -24.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCOW and COWS.

Drawdown Indicators

	HCOW	COWS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.15%	-24.76%	+0.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.29%	-6.44%	+0.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	-0.90%	+0.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.88%	-3.95%	-0.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.95%	2.11%	-0.16%

Volatility

HCOW vs. COWS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF (HCOW) is 3.63%, while Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF (COWS) has a volatility of 4.58%. This indicates that HCOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HCOW	COWS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.63%	4.58%	-0.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.74%	10.09%	-1.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.89%	16.21%	-2.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.60%	18.85%	-1.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.60%	18.85%	-1.25%

HCOW vs. COWS - Expense Ratio Comparison

HCOW has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than COWS's 0.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

HCOW vs. COWS - Dividend Comparison

HCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.73%, more than COWS's 1.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
COWS Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF	1.60%	2.04%	2.08%	0.67%
HCOW Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF	11.73%	10.88%	8.13%	1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HCOW and COWS in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, HCOW and COWS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, HCOW or COWS?

COWS has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to HCOW (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HCOW dropped -24.15% vs COWS's -24.76%.

Which ETF is better, HCOW or COWS?

On 1-year performance, COWS leads with 30.18% vs 21.68% for HCOW. On fees, COWS is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, HCOW has been the lower-risk option at 3.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HCOW or COWS?

Over the 1-year period, COWS has performed better with a 30.18% return vs 21.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HCOW or COWS?

COWS is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for HCOW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HCOW or COWS?

HCOW has the higher dividend yield at 11.73%, compared with 1.60% for COWS.

What is the main difference between HCOW and COWS?

HCOW is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while COWS is Mid Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for HCOW and 0.00% for COWS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

COWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.