PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
HCOW vs. QDVO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between HCOW and QDVO is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

HCOW vs. QDVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF (HCOW) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.39%
15.41%
HCOW
QDVO

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

HCOW:

14.84%

QDVO:

15.19%

Max Drawdown

HCOW:

-8.49%

QDVO:

-4.96%

Current Drawdown

HCOW:

-6.22%

QDVO:

-0.36%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCOW achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly lower than QDVO's 3.24% return.


HCOW

YTD

0.59%

1M

-2.05%

6M

3.22%

1Y

9.47%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

QDVO

YTD

3.24%

1M

1.33%

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HCOW vs. QDVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HCOW has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVO's 0.55% expense ratio.


HCOW
Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF
Expense ratio chart for HCOW: current value at 0.65% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.65%
Expense ratio chart for QDVO: current value at 0.55% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.55%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

HCOW vs. QDVO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HCOW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HCOW is 2323
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HCOW is 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HCOW is 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HCOW is 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HCOW is 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HCOW is 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

QDVO
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HCOW vs. QDVO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF (HCOW) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HCOW, currently valued at 0.55, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.55
The chart of Sortino ratio for HCOW, currently valued at 0.87, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.87
The chart of Omega ratio for HCOW, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.10
The chart of Calmar ratio for HCOW, currently valued at 0.96, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.96
The chart of Martin ratio for HCOW, currently valued at 1.89, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.001.89
HCOW
QDVO


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

HCOW vs. QDVO - Dividend Comparison

HCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.16%, more than QDVO's 3.42% yield.


TTM20242023
HCOW
Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF
8.16%8.13%1.99%
QDVO
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF
3.42%2.78%0.00%

Drawdowns

HCOW vs. QDVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCOW drawdown since its inception was -8.49%, which is greater than QDVO's maximum drawdown of -4.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCOW and QDVO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-6.22%
-0.36%
HCOW
QDVO

Volatility

HCOW vs. QDVO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF (HCOW) is 3.13%, while Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) has a volatility of 4.52%. This indicates that HCOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.50%3.00%3.50%4.00%4.50%5.00%5.50%6.00%OctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.13%
4.52%
HCOW
QDVO
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab