PortfoliosLab logo
HCOW vs. QDVO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between HCOW and QDVO is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

HCOW vs. QDVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF (HCOW) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

HCOW:

21.68%

QDVO:

23.23%

Max Drawdown

HCOW:

-24.15%

QDVO:

-17.75%

Current Drawdown

HCOW:

-12.88%

QDVO:

-4.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCOW achieves a -6.55% return, which is significantly lower than QDVO's -1.03% return.


HCOW

YTD

-6.55%

1M

8.33%

6M

-9.85%

1Y

-4.13%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

QDVO

YTD

-1.03%

1M

7.58%

6M

0.23%

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HCOW vs. QDVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HCOW has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVO's 0.55% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

HCOW vs. QDVO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HCOW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HCOW is 1111
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HCOW is 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HCOW is 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HCOW is 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HCOW is 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HCOW is 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

QDVO
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HCOW vs. QDVO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF (HCOW) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

HCOW vs. QDVO - Dividend Comparison

HCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.38%, more than QDVO's 6.13% yield.


TTM20242023
HCOW
Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF
9.38%8.13%1.99%
QDVO
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF
6.13%2.78%0.00%

Drawdowns

HCOW vs. QDVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCOW drawdown since its inception was -24.15%, which is greater than QDVO's maximum drawdown of -17.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCOW and QDVO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

HCOW vs. QDVO - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...