PortfoliosLab logo
HCOW vs. GCOW
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between HCOW and GCOW is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

HCOW vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF (HCOW) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

HCOW:

15.93%

GCOW:

8.72%

Max Drawdown

HCOW:

-0.65%

GCOW:

-1.11%

Current Drawdown

HCOW:

-0.65%

GCOW:

-0.60%

Returns By Period


HCOW

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

GCOW

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HCOW vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

HCOW has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

HCOW vs. GCOW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HCOW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HCOW is 77
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HCOW is 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HCOW is 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HCOW is 77
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HCOW is 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HCOW is 66
Martin Ratio Rank

GCOW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GCOW is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GCOW is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GCOW is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GCOW is 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GCOW is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GCOW is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HCOW vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF (HCOW) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

HCOW vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison

HCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.76%, while GCOW has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023
HCOW
Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF
9.76%0.00%0.00%
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HCOW vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCOW drawdown since its inception was -0.65%, smaller than the maximum GCOW drawdown of -1.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCOW and GCOW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

HCOW vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...