PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HCMDX vs. FOKFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HCMDX vs. FOKFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HCM Tactical Growth Fund (HCMDX) and Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio (FOKFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCMDX achieves a 12.90% return, which is significantly lower than FOKFX's 27.26% return.


HCMDX

1D
-0.59%
1M
10.73%
YTD
12.90%
6M
10.66%
1Y
39.90%
3Y*
29.66%
5Y*
14.57%
10Y*
18.98%

FOKFX

1D
-0.58%
1M
9.40%
YTD
27.26%
6M
25.91%
1Y
57.24%
3Y*
32.62%
5Y*
18.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HCMDX vs. FOKFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HCMDX
HCM Tactical Growth Fund
12.90%16.55%49.90%32.05%-39.00%38.72%52.10%16.71%
FOKFX
Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio
27.26%20.30%34.58%43.48%-32.32%25.95%47.52%17.08%

Correlation

The correlation between HCMDX and FOKFX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2019

0.95

The correlation between HCMDX and FOKFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HCMDX vs. FOKFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HCMDX
HCMDX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
HCMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HCMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
HCMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
HCMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
HCMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

FOKFX
FOKFX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FOKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FOKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HCMDX vs. FOKFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HCM Tactical Growth Fund (HCMDX) and Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio (FOKFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HCMDXFOKFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.53

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

4.69

-2.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.48

19.45

-12.97

HCMDX vs. FOKFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HCMDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is lower than the FOKFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCMDX and FOKFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HCMDXFOKFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

3.19

-1.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.79

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.96

-0.29

Drawdowns

HCMDX vs. FOKFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCMDX drawdown since its inception was -40.89%, which is greater than FOKFX's maximum drawdown of -37.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCMDX and FOKFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HCMDXFOKFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.89%

-37.26%

-3.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.00%

-12.53%

-4.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.96%

-24.81%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.89%

-37.26%

-3.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-0.58%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.41%

-9.19%

-2.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.24%

3.01%

+3.23%

Volatility

HCMDX vs. FOKFX - Volatility Comparison

HCM Tactical Growth Fund (HCMDX) and Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio (FOKFX) have volatilities of 5.87% and 5.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HCMDXFOKFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.87%

5.72%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.67%

14.57%

+1.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.50%

18.46%

+4.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.08%

23.01%

+1.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.11%

24.63%

-0.52%

HCMDX vs. FOKFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HCMDX has a 2.84% expense ratio, which is higher than FOKFX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

HCMDX vs. FOKFX - Dividend Comparison

HCMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, less than FOKFX's 3.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FOKFX
Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio
3.30%4.20%4.58%0.24%0.08%3.81%0.39%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HCMDX
HCM Tactical Growth Fund
2.64%2.98%23.23%0.00%0.72%0.99%3.24%0.00%5.05%0.00%0.00%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, HCMDX and FOKFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

HCMDX has higher volatility (5.87%) compared to FOKFX (5.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HCMDX dropped -40.89% vs FOKFX's -37.26%.

FOKFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HCMDX and FOKFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer