PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HCMDX vs. BITC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HCMDX vs. BITC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HCM Tactical Growth Fund (HCMDX) and Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCMDX achieves a 10.91% return, which is significantly higher than BITC's 3.58% return.


HCMDX

1D
-0.29%
1M
2.93%
YTD
10.91%
6M
8.57%
1Y
36.37%
3Y*
27.76%
5Y*
13.31%
10Y*
19.46%

BITC

1D
-3.33%
1M
-3.10%
YTD
3.58%
6M
3.49%
1Y
-13.86%
3Y*
28.98%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HCMDX vs. BITC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HCMDX
HCM Tactical Growth Fund
10.91%16.55%49.90%29.02%
BITC
Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF
3.58%-20.46%97.86%42.71%

Correlation

The correlation between HCMDX and BITC is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2023

0.24

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HCMDX vs. BITC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HCMDX
HCMDX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
HCMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HCMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
HCMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
HCMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
HCMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

BITC
BITC Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BITC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITC Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITC Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BITC Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITC Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HCMDX vs. BITC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HCM Tactical Growth Fund (HCMDX) and Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HCMDXBITCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

0.90

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

-0.52

+2.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.12

-0.73

+6.85

HCMDX vs. BITC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HCMDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the BITC Sharpe Ratio of -0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCMDX and BITC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HCMDX vs. BITC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCMDX drawdown since its inception was -40.89%, which is greater than BITC's maximum drawdown of -38.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCMDX and BITC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HCMDXBITCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.89%

-38.51%

-2.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.00%

-26.51%

+9.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.96%

-38.51%

+12.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.35%

-28.82%

+26.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.38%

-16.51%

+5.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.35%

18.94%

-12.59%

Volatility

HCMDX vs. BITC - Volatility Comparison

HCM Tactical Growth Fund (HCMDX) has a higher volatility of 11.33% compared to Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC) at 3.42%. This indicates that HCMDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HCMDXBITCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.33%

3.42%

+7.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.46%

19.00%

-0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.61%

25.12%

-0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.49%

46.29%

-21.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.32%

46.29%

-21.97%

HCMDX vs. BITC - Expense Ratio Comparison

HCMDX has a 2.84% expense ratio, which is higher than BITC's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

HCMDX vs. BITC - Dividend Comparison

HCMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, less than BITC's 3.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BITC
Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF
3.25%3.36%42.68%5.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HCMDX
HCM Tactical Growth Fund
2.69%2.98%23.23%0.00%0.72%0.99%3.24%0.00%5.05%0.00%0.00%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


HCMDX and BITC have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HCMDX has higher volatility (11.33%) compared to BITC (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HCMDX dropped -40.89% vs BITC's -38.51%.

HCMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HCMDX and BITC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer