HCMDX vs. BITC
HCMDX (HCM Tactical Growth Fund) and BITC (Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF) are both funds - HCMDX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Howard Capital Management, while BITC is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Bitwise. Over the past 3 years, HCMDX returned 27.76%/yr vs 28.98%/yr for BITC. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HCMDX charges 2.84%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for BITC.
Performance
HCMDX vs. BITC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HCMDX achieves a 10.91% return, which is significantly higher than BITC's 3.58% return.
HCMDX
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 8.57%
- 1Y
- 36.37%
- 3Y*
- 27.76%
- 5Y*
- 13.31%
- 10Y*
- 19.46%
BITC
- 1D
- -3.33%
- 1M
- -3.10%
- YTD
- 3.58%
- 6M
- 3.49%
- 1Y
- -13.86%
- 3Y*
- 28.98%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HCMDX vs. BITC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HCMDX HCM Tactical Growth Fund | 10.91% | 16.55% | 49.90% | 29.02% |
BITC Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF | 3.58% | -20.46% | 97.86% | 42.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between HCMDX and BITC is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2023 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HCMDX vs. BITC — Risk / Return Rank
HCMDX
BITC
HCMDX vs. BITC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HCM Tactical Growth Fund (HCMDX) and Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HCMDX | BITC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.90 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | -0.52 | +2.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.12 | -0.73 | +6.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HCMDX vs. BITC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HCMDX drawdown since its inception was -40.89%, which is greater than BITC's maximum drawdown of -38.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCMDX and BITC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HCMDX | BITC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.89% | -38.51% | -2.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.00% | -26.51% | +9.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.96% | -38.51% | +12.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.35% | -28.82% | +26.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.38% | -16.51% | +5.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.35% | 18.94% | -12.59% |
Volatility
HCMDX vs. BITC - Volatility Comparison
HCM Tactical Growth Fund (HCMDX) has a higher volatility of 11.33% compared to Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC) at 3.42%. This indicates that HCMDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HCMDX | BITC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.33% | 3.42% | +7.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.46% | 19.00% | -0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.61% | 25.12% | -0.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.49% | 46.29% | -21.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.32% | 46.29% | -21.97% |
HCMDX vs. BITC - Expense Ratio Comparison
HCMDX has a 2.84% expense ratio, which is higher than BITC's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
HCMDX vs. BITC - Dividend Comparison
HCMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, less than BITC's 3.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITC Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF | 3.25% | 3.36% | 42.68% | 5.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HCMDX HCM Tactical Growth Fund | 2.69% | 2.98% | 23.23% | 0.00% | 0.72% | 0.99% | 3.24% | 0.00% | 5.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HCMDX and BITC have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HCMDX has higher volatility (11.33%) compared to BITC (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HCMDX dropped -40.89% vs BITC's -38.51%.
HCMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HCMDX and BITC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer