FOKFX vs. FFSDX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio (FOKFX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K (FFSDX).

FOKFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 13, 2019. FFSDX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 28, 2019.

Performance

FOKFX vs. FFSDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio (FOKFX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K (FFSDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FOKFX vs. FFSDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FOKFX Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio	-5.03%	20.30%	34.58%	43.48%	-32.32%	25.95%	47.52%	14.34%
FFSDX Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K	-0.51%	23.80%	14.16%	20.69%	-18.22%	16.59%	18.26%	9.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOKFX achieves a -5.03% return, which is significantly lower than FFSDX's -0.51% return.

FOKFX

• 1D: 4.58%
• 1M: -5.35%
• YTD: -5.03%
• 6M: -1.77%
• 1Y: 27.30%
• 3Y*: 24.07%
• 5Y*: 12.15%
• 10Y*: —

FFSDX

• 1D: 3.10%
• 1M: -5.84%
• YTD: -0.51%
• 6M: 2.99%
• 1Y: 22.52%
• 3Y*: 16.57%
• 5Y*: 8.60%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOKFX vs. FFSDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOKFX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FFSDX's 0.65% expense ratio.

FFSDX

Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K

FOKFX

Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio

Return for Risk

FOKFX vs. FFSDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOKFX

FOKFX Risk / Return Rank: 70
FOKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
FOKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FOKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
FOKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FOKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

FFSDX

FFSDX Risk / Return Rank: 79
FFSDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FFSDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
FFSDX Omega Ratio Rank: 76
FFSDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FFSDX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOKFX vs. FFSDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio (FOKFX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K (FFSDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FOKFX	FFSDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	1.43	-0.23
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.79	2.03	-0.25
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.30	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.94	2.05	-0.11
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.19	9.02	-1.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FOKFX vs. FFSDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOKFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the FFSDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOKFX and FFSDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FOKFX	FFSDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.21	1.43	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53	0.58	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	0.68	+0.09

Correlation

The correlation between FOKFX and FFSDX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FOKFX vs. FFSDX - Dividend Comparison

FOKFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, more than FFSDX's 3.70% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FOKFX Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio	4.42%	4.20%	4.58%	0.24%	0.08%	3.81%	0.39%	0.32%
FFSDX Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K	3.70%	3.68%	2.75%	2.15%	8.83%	7.86%	2.31%	1.49%

Drawdowns

FOKFX vs. FFSDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOKFX drawdown since its inception was -37.26%, which is greater than FFSDX's maximum drawdown of -31.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOKFX and FFSDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FOKFX	FFSDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.26%	-31.03%	-6.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.72%	-11.15%	-1.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.26%	-27.29%	-9.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.53%	-7.01%	-1.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.40%	-5.99%	-3.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.44%	2.54%	+0.90%

Volatility

FOKFX vs. FFSDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio (FOKFX) has a higher volatility of 8.56% compared to Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K (FFSDX) at 6.71%. This indicates that FOKFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFSDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FOKFX	FFSDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.56%	6.71%	+1.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.69%	10.05%	+4.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.70%	16.24%	+7.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.93%	14.93%	+8.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.71%	17.07%	+7.64%