HCMDX vs. HCMPX
Compare and contrast key facts about HCM Tactical Growth Fund (HCMDX) and HCM Dividend Sector Plus Fund (HCMPX).
HCMDX is managed by Howard Capital Management. It was launched on Jul 30, 2014. HCMPX is managed by Howard Capital Management. It was launched on Mar 10, 2015.
Performance
HCMDX vs. HCMPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HCMDX vs. HCMPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCMDX HCM Tactical Growth Fund | -11.97% | 16.55% | 49.90% | 32.05% | -39.00% | 38.72% | 52.10% | 21.79% | -7.68% | 32.41% |
HCMPX HCM Dividend Sector Plus Fund | -5.93% | 15.92% | 43.56% | 16.87% | -22.96% | 36.55% | 27.80% | 24.02% | -14.61% | 17.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HCMDX achieves a -11.97% return, which is significantly lower than HCMPX's -5.93% return. Over the past 10 years, HCMDX has outperformed HCMPX with an annualized return of 16.03%, while HCMPX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.89% annualized return.
HCMDX
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -8.53%
- YTD
- -11.97%
- 6M
- -9.93%
- 1Y
- 21.88%
- 3Y*
- 23.84%
- 5Y*
- 10.47%
- 10Y*
- 16.03%
HCMPX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -7.28%
- YTD
- -5.93%
- 6M
- -3.57%
- 1Y
- 19.80%
- 3Y*
- 21.93%
- 5Y*
- 12.23%
- 10Y*
- 13.89%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HCMDX vs. HCMPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HCMDX has a 2.84% expense ratio, which is higher than HCMPX's 2.38% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HCMDX vs. HCMPX — Risk / Return Rank
HCMDX
HCMPX
HCMDX vs. HCMPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HCM Tactical Growth Fund (HCMDX) and HCM Dividend Sector Plus Fund (HCMPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HCMDX | HCMPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 1.09 | -0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.33 | 1.55 | -0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.20 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 1.56 | -0.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.01 | 5.77 | -2.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HCMDX | HCMPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 1.09 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.63 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.69 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.64 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between HCMDX and HCMPX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HCMDX vs. HCMPX - Dividend Comparison
HCMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than HCMPX's 0.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCMDX HCM Tactical Growth Fund | 3.38% | 2.98% | 23.23% | 0.00% | 0.72% | 0.99% | 3.24% | 0.00% | 5.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.47% |
HCMPX HCM Dividend Sector Plus Fund | 0.46% | 0.43% | 29.52% | 5.15% | 8.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.15% | 12.87% | 8.64% | 4.18% | 2.18% |
Drawdowns
HCMDX vs. HCMPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HCMDX drawdown since its inception was -40.89%, which is greater than HCMPX's maximum drawdown of -28.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCMDX and HCMPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HCMDX | HCMPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.89% | -28.88% | -12.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.00% | -10.42% | -6.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.89% | -26.86% | -14.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.89% | -28.88% | -12.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.00% | -9.15% | -7.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.50% | -8.04% | -3.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.40% | 2.82% | +2.58% |
Volatility
HCMDX vs. HCMPX - Volatility Comparison
HCM Tactical Growth Fund (HCMDX) has a higher volatility of 7.33% compared to HCM Dividend Sector Plus Fund (HCMPX) at 5.73%. This indicates that HCMDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HCMPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HCMDX | HCMPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.33% | 5.73% | +1.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.58% | 13.95% | +4.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.01% | 18.46% | +5.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.23% | 19.66% | +4.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.08% | 20.21% | +3.87% |