HCMDX vs. SPHD

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

HCMDX (HCM Tactical Growth Fund) and SPHD (Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF) are both funds - HCMDX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Howard Capital Management, while SPHD is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Over the past 10 years, HCMDX returned 16.92%/yr vs 7.28%/yr for SPHD. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. HCMDX charges 2.84%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SPHD.

Performance

HCMDX vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HCM Tactical Growth Fund (HCMDX) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCMDX achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly lower than SPHD's 12.28% return. Over the past 10 years, HCMDX has outperformed SPHD with an annualized return of 16.92%, while SPHD has yielded a comparatively lower 7.28% annualized return.

HCMDX

• 1D: 4.42%
• 1M: -5.37%
• 6M: -0.29%
• YTD: 0.39%
• 1Y: 15.86%
• 3Y*: 20.46%
• 5Y*: 9.73%
• 10Y*: 16.92%
• ALL TIME*: 14.38%

SPHD

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.89%
• 6M: 6.75%
• YTD: 12.28%
• 1Y: 15.51%
• 3Y*: 12.02%
• 5Y*: 8.00%
• 10Y*: 7.28%
• ALL TIME*: 9.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HCMDX HCM Tactical Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF	$45.09M	$45.47M	$42.29M

HCMDX vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HCMDX HCM Tactical Growth Fund	0.39%	16.55%	49.90%	32.05%	-39.00%	38.72%	52.10%	21.79%	-7.68%	32.41%
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF	12.28%	3.41%	18.08%	1.32%	0.58%	24.98%	-9.98%	20.26%	-6.17%	11.90%

Correlation

The correlation between HCMDX and SPHD is -0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.09
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.10
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.27
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015	0.47

The correlation between HCMDX and SPHD shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HCMDX vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HCMDX

HCMDX Risk / Return Rank: 12
HCMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
HCMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
HCMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
HCMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
HCMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

SPHD

SPHD Risk / Return Rank: 53
SPHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
SPHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
SPHD Omega Ratio Rank: 49
SPHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
SPHD Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HCMDX vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HCM Tactical Growth Fund (HCMDX) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HCMDX	SPHD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.42	1.30	-0.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.74	1.97	-1.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.22	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.66	2.08	-1.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.64	5.19	-3.55

HCMDX vs. SPHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HCMDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the SPHD Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCMDX and SPHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HCMDX vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCMDX drawdown since its inception was -40.89%, roughly equal to the maximum SPHD drawdown of -41.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCMDX and SPHD.

Drawdown Indicators

	HCMDX	SPHD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.89%	-41.39%	+0.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.00%	-7.33%	-9.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.96%	-13.29%	-12.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.89%	-19.50%	-21.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.89%	-41.39%	+0.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.61%	-2.24%	-9.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.35%	-4.66%	-6.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.88%	2.93%	+3.95%

Volatility

HCMDX vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison

HCM Tactical Growth Fund (HCMDX) has a higher volatility of 9.26% compared to Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) at 4.63%. This indicates that HCMDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HCMDX	SPHD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.26%	4.63%	+4.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.69%	9.12%	+11.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.66%	11.81%	+14.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.92%	14.24%	+10.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.41%	17.67%	+6.74%

HCMDX vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

HCMDX has a 2.84% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHD's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

HCMDX vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison

HCMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, less than SPHD's 4.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HCMDX HCM Tactical Growth Fund	2.97%	2.98%	23.23%	0.00%	0.72%	0.99%	3.24%	0.00%	5.05%	0.00%	0.00%	1.47%
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF	4.56%	4.02%	3.41%	4.48%	3.89%	3.45%	4.89%	4.07%	4.40%	3.14%	3.83%	3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HCMDX and SPHD in my portfolio?

HCMDX and SPHD have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HCMDX or SPHD?

HCMDX has higher volatility (9.26%) compared to SPHD (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HCMDX dropped -40.89% vs SPHD's -41.39%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.