PortfoliosLab logo
HCMDX vs. LGH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between HCMDX and LGH is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

HCMDX vs. LGH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HCM Tactical Growth Fund (HCMDX) and HCM Defender 500 Index ETF (LGH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

HCMDX:

0.35

LGH:

0.47

Sortino Ratio

HCMDX:

0.56

LGH:

0.76

Omega Ratio

HCMDX:

1.07

LGH:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

HCMDX:

0.28

LGH:

0.52

Martin Ratio

HCMDX:

0.64

LGH:

1.38

Ulcer Index

HCMDX:

12.28%

LGH:

6.94%

Daily Std Dev

HCMDX:

27.58%

LGH:

19.97%

Max Drawdown

HCMDX:

-40.89%

LGH:

-29.60%

Current Drawdown

HCMDX:

-15.02%

LGH:

-6.41%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCMDX achieves a -7.25% return, which is significantly lower than LGH's -1.67% return.


HCMDX

YTD

-7.25%

1M

7.34%

6M

-8.90%

1Y

9.62%

3Y*

11.17%

5Y*

14.35%

10Y*

12.33%

LGH

YTD

-1.67%

1M

6.03%

6M

-5.24%

1Y

9.40%

3Y*

12.37%

5Y*

15.48%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HCM Tactical Growth Fund

HCM Defender 500 Index ETF

HCMDX vs. LGH - Expense Ratio Comparison

HCMDX has a 2.84% expense ratio, which is higher than LGH's 1.23% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

HCMDX vs. LGH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HCMDX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HCMDX is 2424
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HCMDX is 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HCMDX is 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HCMDX is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HCMDX is 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HCMDX is 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

LGH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LGH is 4343
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LGH is 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LGH is 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LGH is 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LGH is 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LGH is 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HCMDX vs. LGH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HCM Tactical Growth Fund (HCMDX) and HCM Defender 500 Index ETF (LGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current HCMDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is comparable to the LGH Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCMDX and LGH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

HCMDX vs. LGH - Dividend Comparison

HCMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.53%, more than LGH's 0.41% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HCMDX
HCM Tactical Growth Fund
12.53%11.62%0.00%0.72%0.99%3.24%0.00%5.05%0.00%0.00%1.47%
LGH
HCM Defender 500 Index ETF
0.41%0.40%0.63%0.61%0.14%0.23%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HCMDX vs. LGH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCMDX drawdown since its inception was -40.89%, which is greater than LGH's maximum drawdown of -29.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCMDX and LGH.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

HCMDX vs. LGH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HCM Tactical Growth Fund (HCMDX) is 5.79%, while HCM Defender 500 Index ETF (LGH) has a volatility of 6.31%. This indicates that HCMDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...