PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOKFX vs. FBCGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FOKFX vs. FBCGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio (FOKFX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOKFX achieves a 25.05% return, which is significantly higher than FBCGX's 16.59% return.


FOKFX

1D
-0.88%
1M
2.28%
YTD
25.05%
6M
24.34%
1Y
51.44%
3Y*
31.36%
5Y*
16.66%
10Y*

FBCGX

1D
-1.71%
1M
3.47%
YTD
16.59%
6M
15.24%
1Y
40.13%
3Y*
30.77%
5Y*
15.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOKFX vs. FBCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FOKFX
Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio
25.05%20.30%34.58%43.48%-32.32%25.95%47.52%17.08%
FBCGX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund
16.59%21.33%38.15%55.57%-37.84%23.00%62.92%16.20%

Correlation

The correlation between FOKFX and FBCGX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2019

0.97

The correlation between FOKFX and FBCGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOKFX vs. FBCGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOKFX
FOKFX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FOKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FOKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

FBCGX
FBCGX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FBCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FBCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOKFX vs. FBCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio (FOKFX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FOKFXFBCGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.38

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.22

3.29

+0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.68

13.41

+3.26

FOKFX vs. FBCGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOKFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the FBCGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOKFX and FBCGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FOKFX vs. FBCGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOKFX drawdown since its inception was -37.26%, smaller than the maximum FBCGX drawdown of -42.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOKFX and FBCGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FOKFXFBCGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.26%

-42.55%

+5.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.53%

-12.64%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.81%

-26.83%

+2.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.26%

-42.55%

+5.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.31%

-2.03%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.15%

-8.85%

-0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

3.09%

+0.07%

Volatility

FOKFX vs. FBCGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio (FOKFX) has a higher volatility of 8.94% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX) at 8.31%. This indicates that FOKFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBCGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FOKFXFBCGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.94%

8.31%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.54%

15.06%

+1.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.14%

19.18%

+0.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.28%

25.19%

-1.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.73%

24.93%

-0.20%

FOKFX vs. FBCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOKFX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FBCGX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FOKFX vs. FBCGX - Dividend Comparison

FOKFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, more than FBCGX's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FBCGX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund
0.83%0.97%0.62%0.26%0.12%6.71%1.26%0.28%0.46%0.13%
FOKFX
Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio
3.36%4.20%4.58%0.24%0.08%3.81%0.39%0.32%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FOKFX and FBCGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FOKFX has higher volatility (8.94%) compared to FBCGX (8.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOKFX dropped -37.26% vs FBCGX's -42.55%.

FOKFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOKFX and FBCGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer