HBRD vs. XLG

Last updated Jul 28, 2026

HBRD (Invesco U.S. Hybrid Bond ETF) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HBRD is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the ICE USD Developed Markets Corporate Ex-Banks Hybrid Bond 4.85% Constrained Index, while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. HBRD charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.

Performance

HBRD vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco U.S. Hybrid Bond ETF (HBRD) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

HBRD

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: -0.47%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

XLG

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 0.81%
• 6M: 1.67%
• YTD: 1.21%
• 1Y: 11.83%
• 3Y*: 19.28%
• 5Y*: 13.18%
• 10Y*: 16.11%
• ALL TIME*: 11.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HBRD Invesco U.S. Hybrid Bond ETF	$169.16	$296.60	$2.86K
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	$58.39M	$79.44M	$104.79M

HBRD vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
HBRD Invesco U.S. Hybrid Bond ETF	-0.24%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	4.29%

Correlation

The correlation between HBRD and XLG is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2026	0.70

Return for Risk

HBRD vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBRD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XLG

XLG Risk / Return Rank: 31
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 31
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBRD vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco U.S. Hybrid Bond ETF (HBRD) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HBRD	XLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.83	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.21	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.15	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.96	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	3.06	—

Drawdowns

HBRD vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBRD drawdown since its inception was -2.94%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBRD and XLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	HBRD	XLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.94%	-52.39%	+49.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.41%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.70%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.02%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-30.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	-7.27%	+6.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.64%	-7.62%	+6.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.87%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HBRD	XLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.47%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.10%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.25%	14.42%	-11.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.25%	18.84%	-15.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.25%	18.90%	-15.65%

HBRD vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

HBRD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

HBRD vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

HBRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than XLG's 0.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HBRD Invesco U.S. Hybrid Bond ETF	2.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	0.66%	0.64%	0.72%	0.97%	1.34%	0.94%	1.25%	1.58%	2.00%	1.85%	2.00%	2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HBRD and XLG in my portfolio?

HBRD and XLG have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HBRD or XLG?

On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HBRD or XLG?

XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for HBRD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HBRD or XLG?

HBRD has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 0.66% for XLG.

What is the main difference between HBRD and XLG?

HBRD is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while XLG is S&P 500. HBRD tracks ICE USD Developed Markets Corporate Ex-Banks Hybrid Bond 4.85% Constrained Index, while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HBRD and 0.20% for XLG.