HBRD vs. VCLT
HBRD (Invesco U.S. Hybrid Bond ETF) and VCLT (Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - HBRD tracks the ICE USD Developed Markets Corporate Ex-Banks Hybrid Bond 4.85% Constrained Index while VCLT tracks the Bloomberg U.S. 10+ Year Corporate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. HBRD charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VCLT.
Performance
HBRD vs. VCLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HBRD
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -0.47%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
VCLT
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -3.80%
- 6M
- -3.08%
- YTD
- -1.82%
- 1Y
- 1.78%
- 3Y*
- 3.01%
- 5Y*
- -3.42%
- 10Y*
- 1.46%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.36%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $169.16 | $296.60 | $2.86K | |
| $207.81M | $262.50M | $364.81M |
HBRD vs. VCLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HBRD Invesco U.S. Hybrid Bond ETF | -0.24% |
VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF | -4.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between HBRD and VCLT is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2026 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBRD vs. VCLT — Risk / Return Rank
HBRD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VCLT
HBRD vs. VCLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco U.S. Hybrid Bond ETF (HBRD) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HBRD | VCLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.04 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.34 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.76 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HBRD vs. VCLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBRD drawdown since its inception was -2.94%, smaller than the maximum VCLT drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBRD and VCLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBRD | VCLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.94% | -34.31% | +31.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -16.73% | +16.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.64% | -8.21% | +7.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.35% | — |
Volatility
HBRD vs. VCLT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HBRD | VCLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.96% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.89% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.25% | 7.79% | -4.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.25% | 12.74% | -9.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.25% | 12.83% | -9.58% |
HBRD vs. VCLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
HBRD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VCLT's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
HBRD vs. VCLT - Dividend Comparison
HBRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, less than VCLT's 5.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBRD Invesco U.S. Hybrid Bond ETF | 2.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 5.73% | 5.51% | 5.19% | 4.67% | 4.44% | 3.07% | 3.16% | 3.81% | 4.55% | 4.01% | 4.33% | 4.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HBRD and VCLT have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VCLT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VCLT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for HBRD.
VCLT has the higher dividend yield at 5.73%, compared with 2.49% for HBRD.
HBRD tracks ICE USD Developed Markets Corporate Ex-Banks Hybrid Bond 4.85% Constrained Index, while VCLT tracks Bloomberg U.S. 10+ Year Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HBRD and 0.03% for VCLT.
Find the right allocation for HBRD and VCLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer