HBRD vs. RSP
HBRD (Invesco U.S. Hybrid Bond ETF) and RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HBRD is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the ICE USD Developed Markets Corporate Ex-Banks Hybrid Bond 4.85% Constrained Index, while RSP is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HBRD charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for RSP.
Performance
HBRD vs. RSP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HBRD
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSP
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 3.72%
- 6M
- 9.89%
- YTD
- 13.01%
- 1Y
- 18.83%
- 3Y*
- 14.94%
- 5Y*
- 9.26%
- 10Y*
- 12.06%
HBRD vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HBRD Invesco U.S. Hybrid Bond ETF | 0.31% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 6.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between HBRD and RSP is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2026 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBRD vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank
HBRD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RSP
HBRD vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco U.S. Hybrid Bond ETF (HBRD) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HBRD | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.28 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.41 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.10 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HBRD vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBRD drawdown since its inception was -2.94%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBRD and RSP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBRD | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.94% | -59.92% | +56.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.13% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.68% | -6.63% | +5.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.07% | — |
Volatility
HBRD vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HBRD | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.84% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.75% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.39% | 11.78% | -8.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.39% | 16.21% | -12.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.39% | 18.28% | -14.89% |
HBRD vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison
HBRD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
HBRD vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison
HBRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, more than RSP's 1.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBRD Invesco U.S. Hybrid Bond ETF | 1.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 1.49% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 1.69% | 2.02% | 1.52% | 1.20% | 1.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HBRD and RSP have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for HBRD.
HBRD has the higher dividend yield at 1.98%, compared with 1.49% for RSP.
HBRD is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while RSP is S&P 500. HBRD tracks ICE USD Developed Markets Corporate Ex-Banks Hybrid Bond 4.85% Constrained Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HBRD and 0.20% for RSP.
Find the right allocation for HBRD and RSP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer