HBRD vs. QQQM
HBRD (Invesco U.S. Hybrid Bond ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HBRD is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the ICE USD Developed Markets Corporate Ex-Banks Hybrid Bond 4.85% Constrained Index, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HBRD charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.
Performance
HBRD vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HBRD
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQM
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- 6M
- 14.10%
- YTD
- 15.80%
- 1Y
- 29.24%
- 3Y*
- 25.46%
- 5Y*
- 15.38%
- 10Y*
- —
HBRD vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HBRD Invesco U.S. Hybrid Bond ETF | 0.31% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 17.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between HBRD and QQQM is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2026 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBRD vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
HBRD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QQQM
HBRD vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco U.S. Hybrid Bond ETF (HBRD) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HBRD | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.46 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.88 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HBRD vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBRD drawdown since its inception was -2.94%, smaller than the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBRD and QQQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBRD | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.94% | -35.04% | +32.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -4.80% | +4.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.68% | -8.17% | +7.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.30% | — |
Volatility
HBRD vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HBRD | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.87% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.06% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.39% | 18.28% | -14.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.39% | 22.62% | -19.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.39% | 22.31% | -18.92% |
HBRD vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
HBRD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
HBRD vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
HBRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, more than QQQM's 0.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBRD Invesco U.S. Hybrid Bond ETF | 1.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.45% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HBRD and QQQM have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for HBRD.
HBRD has the higher dividend yield at 1.98%, compared with 0.45% for QQQM.
HBRD is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. HBRD tracks ICE USD Developed Markets Corporate Ex-Banks Hybrid Bond 4.85% Constrained Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HBRD and 0.15% for QQQM.
Find the right allocation for HBRD and QQQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer