PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HAWX vs. EFAS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HAWX vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAWX achieves a 16.31% return, which is significantly higher than EFAS's 13.06% return.


HAWX

1D
0.20%
1M
5.06%
YTD
16.31%
6M
18.14%
1Y
35.60%
3Y*
21.62%
5Y*
12.85%
10Y*
12.07%

EFAS

1D
0.09%
1M
-1.69%
YTD
13.06%
6M
17.18%
1Y
28.75%
3Y*
24.51%
5Y*
12.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAWX vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HAWX
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
16.31%26.24%14.88%17.05%-8.59%13.40%6.92%22.75%-9.77%19.21%
EFAS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF
13.06%46.83%3.07%14.65%-8.00%12.75%-5.42%14.60%-11.60%22.76%

Correlation

The correlation between HAWX and EFAS is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2016

0.63

The correlation between HAWX and EFAS shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HAWX vs. EFAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HAWX
EFAS

Financial Services

23.6%
30.1%

Technology

21.4%
0.1%

Industrials

13.9%
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
1.9%

Healthcare

6.8%
0.1%

Basic Materials

6.6%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
8.1%

Energy

5.0%
13.7%

Communication Services

4.8%
8.6%

Utilities

2.8%
14.4%

Real Estate

1.2%
11.3%

Financial Services

HAWX
23.6%
EFAS
30.1%

Technology

HAWX
21.4%
EFAS
0.1%

Industrials

HAWX
13.9%
EFAS
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

HAWX
7.3%
EFAS
1.9%

Healthcare

HAWX
6.8%
EFAS
0.1%

Basic Materials

HAWX
6.6%
EFAS
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

HAWX
5.0%
EFAS
8.1%

Energy

HAWX
5.0%
EFAS
13.7%

Communication Services

HAWX
4.8%
EFAS
8.6%

Utilities

HAWX
2.8%
EFAS
14.4%

Real Estate

HAWX
1.2%
EFAS
11.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HAWX vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAWX
HAWX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
HAWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAWX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
HAWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAWX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

EFAS
EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAWX vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HAWXEFASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.47

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.81

5.45

-1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.02

14.46

+1.57

HAWX vs. EFAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAWX Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is comparable to the EFAS Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAWX and EFAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HAWXEFASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75

2.73

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

0.78

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.56

+0.11

Drawdowns

HAWX vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAWX drawdown since its inception was -30.63%, smaller than the maximum EFAS drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAWX and EFAS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HAWXEFASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.63%

-44.38%

+13.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.39%

-5.30%

-4.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.30%

-11.84%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.47%

-28.81%

+11.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-2.92%

+2.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.28%

-7.07%

+2.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

1.99%

+0.24%

Volatility

HAWX vs. EFAS - Volatility Comparison

iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) at 2.76%. This indicates that HAWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HAWXEFASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

2.76%

+1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.10%

8.19%

+2.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.00%

10.57%

+2.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.33%

15.59%

-2.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.19%

18.33%

-3.14%

HAWX vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAWX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than EFAS's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

HAWX vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison

HAWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, less than EFAS's 4.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFAS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF
4.72%4.83%6.76%6.33%7.28%5.19%4.34%5.75%6.63%6.15%0.21%0.00%
HAWX
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
2.41%2.80%3.31%2.95%16.94%2.63%2.00%3.23%2.51%2.40%2.49%3.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


HAWX and EFAS have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HAWX has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to EFAS (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAWX dropped -30.63% vs EFAS's -44.38%.

On 5-year performance, HAWX leads with 12.85% vs 12.06% for EFAS. On fees, HAWX is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, EFAS has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HAWX has performed better with a 12.85% return vs 12.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HAWX is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for EFAS.

EFAS has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 2.41% for HAWX.

HAWX tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA 100% Hedged to USD, while EFAS tracks MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HAWX and 0.56% for EFAS.

HAWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HAWX and EFAS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer