HAWX vs. EFAS

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

HAWX (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF) and EFAS (Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - HAWX tracks the MSCI ACWI ex USA 100% Hedged to USD while EFAS tracks the MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HAWX returned 12.84%/yr vs 12.10%/yr for EFAS. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HAWX charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for EFAS.

Performance

HAWX vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAWX achieves a 17.15% return, which is significantly higher than EFAS's 11.96% return.

HAWX

• 1D: 0.85%
• 1M: 1.78%
• YTD: 17.15%
• 6M: 17.23%
• 1Y: 36.02%
• 3Y*: 21.90%
• 5Y*: 12.84%
• 10Y*: 12.59%

EFAS

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: -2.71%
• YTD: 11.96%
• 6M: 11.86%
• 1Y: 25.63%
• 3Y*: 24.43%
• 5Y*: 12.10%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAWX vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HAWX iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF	17.15%	26.24%	14.88%	17.05%	-8.59%	13.40%	6.92%	22.75%	-9.77%	19.21%
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	11.96%	46.83%	3.07%	14.65%	-8.00%	12.75%	-5.42%	14.60%	-11.60%	22.76%

Correlation

The correlation between HAWX and EFAS is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2016	0.63

The correlation between HAWX and EFAS shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HAWX vs. EFAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HAWX	EFAS
Financial Services	23.2%	31.0%
Technology	22.5%	0.1%
Industrials	14.2%	10.4%
Consumer Cyclical	7.5%	1.9%
Basic Materials	6.9%	1.7%
Healthcare	6.8%	0.1%
Communication Services	4.9%	8.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	8.1%
Energy	4.8%	13.1%
Utilities	3.0%	13.7%
Real Estate	1.4%	11.4%

Return for Risk

HAWX vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAWX

HAWX Risk / Return Rank: 86
HAWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
HAWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
HAWX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
HAWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
HAWX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

EFAS

EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 83
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 80
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAWX vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HAWX	EFAS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.54	2.35	+0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.36	3.33	+0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.41	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.85	4.86	-1.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.83	12.31	+3.52

HAWX vs. EFAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAWX Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the EFAS Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAWX and EFAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HAWX vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAWX drawdown since its inception was -30.63%, smaller than the maximum EFAS drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAWX and EFAS.

Drawdown Indicators

	HAWX	EFAS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.63%	-44.38%	+13.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.39%	-5.30%	-4.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.30%	-11.84%	-1.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.47%	-28.81%	+11.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.10%	-3.87%	+1.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.27%	-7.04%	+2.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.28%	2.09%	+0.19%

Volatility

HAWX vs. EFAS - Volatility Comparison

iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX) has a higher volatility of 6.52% compared to Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) at 3.45%. This indicates that HAWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HAWX	EFAS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.52%	3.45%	+3.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.61%	8.68%	+3.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.26%	10.94%	+3.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.60%	15.58%	-1.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.27%	18.30%	-3.03%

HAWX vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAWX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than EFAS's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

HAWX vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison

HAWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, less than EFAS's 4.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	4.77%	4.83%	6.76%	6.33%	7.28%	5.19%	4.34%	5.75%	6.63%	6.15%	0.21%	0.00%
HAWX iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF	2.39%	2.80%	3.31%	2.95%	16.94%	2.63%	2.00%	3.23%	2.51%	2.40%	2.49%	3.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HAWX and EFAS in my portfolio?

HAWX and EFAS have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HAWX or EFAS?

HAWX has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to EFAS (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAWX dropped -30.63% vs EFAS's -44.38%.

Which ETF is better, HAWX or EFAS?

On 5-year performance, HAWX leads with 12.84% vs 12.10% for EFAS. On fees, HAWX is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, EFAS has been the lower-risk option at 3.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HAWX or EFAS?

Over the 5-year period, HAWX has performed better with a 12.84% return vs 12.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HAWX or EFAS?

HAWX is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for EFAS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HAWX or EFAS?

EFAS has the higher dividend yield at 4.77%, compared with 2.39% for HAWX.

What is the main difference between HAWX and EFAS?

HAWX tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA 100% Hedged to USD, while EFAS tracks MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HAWX and 0.56% for EFAS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HAWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.