HAWX vs. HEFA
HAWX (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF) and HEFA (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds from iShares - HAWX tracks the MSCI ACWI ex USA 100% Hedged to USD while HEFA tracks the MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to USD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HAWX returned 12.50%/yr vs 13.44%/yr for HEFA. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
HAWX vs. HEFA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAWX achieves a 16.22% return, which is significantly higher than HEFA's 12.09% return. Over the past 10 years, HAWX has underperformed HEFA with an annualized return of 12.50%, while HEFA has yielded a comparatively higher 13.44% annualized return.
HAWX
- 1D
- -2.87%
- 1M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 16.22%
- 6M
- 16.28%
- 1Y
- 35.93%
- 3Y*
- 21.68%
- 5Y*
- 12.75%
- 10Y*
- 12.50%
HEFA
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- 2.31%
- YTD
- 12.09%
- 6M
- 12.33%
- 1Y
- 29.40%
- 3Y*
- 19.37%
- 5Y*
- 13.74%
- 10Y*
- 13.44%
HAWX vs. HEFA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAWX iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | 16.22% | 26.24% | 14.88% | 17.05% | -8.59% | 13.40% | 6.92% | 22.75% | -9.77% | 19.21% |
HEFA iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF | 12.09% | 24.58% | 13.71% | 20.33% | -4.86% | 19.59% | 2.09% | 27.63% | -9.33% | 16.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between HAWX and HEFA is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2015 | 0.83 |
The correlation between HAWX and HEFA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
HAWX vs. HEFA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HAWX
HEFA
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
HAWX
HEFA
Technology
HAWX
HEFA
Industrials
HAWX
HEFA
Consumer Cyclical
HAWX
HEFA
Basic Materials
HAWX
HEFA
Healthcare
HAWX
HEFA
Communication Services
HAWX
HEFA
Consumer Defensive
HAWX
HEFA
Energy
HAWX
HEFA
Utilities
HAWX
HEFA
Real Estate
HAWX
HEFA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HAWX vs. HEFA — Risk / Return Rank
HAWX
HEFA
HAWX vs. HEFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF (HEFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HAWX | HEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.42 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.84 | 3.10 | +0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.87 | 12.99 | +2.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HAWX vs. HEFA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAWX drawdown since its inception was -30.63%, smaller than the maximum HEFA drawdown of -32.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAWX and HEFA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAWX | HEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.63% | -32.39% | +1.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.39% | -9.52% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.30% | -14.28% | +0.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.47% | -14.79% | -2.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.63% | -32.39% | +1.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.87% | -1.61% | -1.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.27% | -4.15% | -0.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | 2.27% | 0.00% |
Volatility
HAWX vs. HEFA - Volatility Comparison
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX) has a higher volatility of 6.70% compared to iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF (HEFA) at 4.50%. This indicates that HAWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HEFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HAWX | HEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.70% | 4.50% | +2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.61% | 10.80% | +1.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.27% | 13.11% | +1.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.60% | 13.86% | -0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.27% | 15.71% | -0.44% |
HAWX vs. HEFA - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both HAWX and HEFA have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
HAWX vs. HEFA - Dividend Comparison
HAWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, less than HEFA's 3.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAWX iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | 2.41% | 2.80% | 3.31% | 2.95% | 16.94% | 2.63% | 2.00% | 3.23% | 2.51% | 2.40% | 2.49% | 3.86% |
HEFA iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF | 3.92% | 4.40% | 3.09% | 3.02% | 25.14% | 3.06% | 2.10% | 7.56% | 4.58% | 2.55% | 3.17% | 3.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, HAWX and HEFA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
HAWX has higher volatility (6.70%) compared to HEFA (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAWX dropped -30.63% vs HEFA's -32.39%.
On 10-year performance, HEFA leads with 13.44% vs 12.50% for HAWX. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, HEFA has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HEFA has performed better with a 13.44% return vs 12.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HAWX and HEFA have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
HEFA has the higher dividend yield at 3.92%, compared with 2.41% for HAWX.
HAWX tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA 100% Hedged to USD, while HEFA tracks MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to USD Index.
HAWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HAWX and HEFA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer