HAL vs. STLD
HAL (Halliburton Company) and STLD (Steel Dynamics, Inc.) are both stocks. HAL operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while STLD operates in Steel (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, HAL returned 0.88%/yr vs 29.92%/yr for STLD. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HAL vs. STLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAL achieves a 41.41% return, which is significantly lower than STLD's 67.39% return. Over the past 10 years, HAL has underperformed STLD with an annualized return of 0.88%, while STLD has yielded a comparatively higher 29.92% annualized return.
HAL
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -4.77%
- YTD
- 41.41%
- 6M
- 39.63%
- 1Y
- 74.73%
- 3Y*
- 9.02%
- 5Y*
- 12.63%
- 10Y*
- 0.88%
STLD
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- 23.29%
- YTD
- 67.39%
- 6M
- 65.42%
- 1Y
- 114.70%
- 3Y*
- 40.23%
- 5Y*
- 36.27%
- 10Y*
- 29.92%
HAL vs. STLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAL Halliburton Company | 41.41% | 7.02% | -23.19% | -6.47% | 74.45% | 21.99% | -21.23% | -4.90% | -44.63% | -8.18% |
STLD Steel Dynamics, Inc. | 67.39% | 50.70% | -1.99% | 22.75% | 60.14% | 71.42% | 12.46% | 16.78% | -29.02% | 23.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between HAL and STLD is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 1996 | 0.39 |
The correlation between HAL and STLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.43 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
HAL:
$33.22B
STLD:
$40.94B
HAL:
$1.82
STLD:
$9.33
HAL:
21.80
STLD:
30.30
HAL:
1.51
STLD:
2.19
HAL:
3.07
STLD:
4.47
HAL:
$22.17B
STLD:
$19.01B
HAL:
$3.40B
STLD:
$2.66B
HAL:
$3.83B
STLD:
$2.23B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HAL vs. STLD — Risk / Return Rank
HAL
STLD
HAL vs. STLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Halliburton Company (HAL) and Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HAL | STLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.50 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.47 | 5.81 | +0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.47 | 19.49 | -3.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HAL vs. STLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAL drawdown since its inception was -92.99%, which is greater than STLD's maximum drawdown of -87.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAL and STLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAL | STLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.99% | -87.05% | -5.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.10% | -20.33% | +7.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.01% | -28.66% | -25.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.01% | -32.20% | -21.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.45% | -68.46% | -22.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.89% | 0.00% | -32.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.12% | -33.27% | -5.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.14% | 6.04% | -0.90% |
Volatility
HAL vs. STLD - Volatility Comparison
Halliburton Company (HAL) and Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD) have volatilities of 9.32% and 9.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HAL | STLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.32% | 9.70% | -0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.13% | 24.96% | -0.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.76% | 33.38% | +3.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.18% | 38.03% | +2.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.96% | 39.31% | +6.65% |
Dividends
HAL vs. STLD - Dividend Comparison
HAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, more than STLD's 0.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAL Halliburton Company | 1.72% | 2.41% | 2.50% | 1.77% | 1.22% | 0.79% | 1.67% | 2.94% | 2.71% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 2.12% |
STLD Steel Dynamics, Inc. | 0.72% | 1.18% | 1.61% | 1.44% | 1.39% | 1.68% | 2.71% | 2.82% | 2.50% | 1.44% | 1.57% | 3.08% |
Financials
HAL vs. STLD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Halliburton Company and Steel Dynamics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HAL vs. STLD - Profitability Comparison
HAL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported a gross profit of 790.00M and revenue of 5.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.6%.
STLD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Steel Dynamics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 763.22M and revenue of 5.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.7%.
HAL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported an operating income of 679.00M and revenue of 5.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.6%.
STLD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Steel Dynamics, Inc. reported an operating income of 538.00M and revenue of 5.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.3%.
HAL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported a net income of 461.00M and revenue of 5.40B, resulting in a net margin of 8.5%.
STLD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Steel Dynamics, Inc. reported a net income of 403.44M and revenue of 5.20B, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HAL and STLD have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STLD has higher volatility (9.70%) compared to HAL (9.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAL dropped -92.99% vs STLD's -87.05%.
STLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.54 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HAL and STLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer