HAL vs. EOG
HAL (Halliburton Company) and EOG (EOG Resources, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Energy sector — HAL in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services, EOG in Oil & Gas E&P. Over the past 10 years, HAL returned 0.88%/yr vs 8.50%/yr for EOG. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
HAL vs. EOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAL achieves a 41.41% return, which is significantly higher than EOG's 32.39% return. Over the past 10 years, HAL has underperformed EOG with an annualized return of 0.88%, while EOG has yielded a comparatively higher 8.50% annualized return.
HAL
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -3.05%
- YTD
- 41.41%
- 6M
- 39.63%
- 1Y
- 84.34%
- 3Y*
- 9.02%
- 5Y*
- 12.63%
- 10Y*
- 0.88%
EOG
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 1.27%
- YTD
- 32.39%
- 6M
- 28.71%
- 1Y
- 17.36%
- 3Y*
- 10.45%
- 5Y*
- 15.40%
- 10Y*
- 8.50%
HAL vs. EOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAL Halliburton Company | 41.41% | 7.02% | -23.19% | -6.47% | 74.45% | 21.99% | -21.23% | -4.90% | -44.63% | -8.18% |
EOG EOG Resources, Inc. | 32.39% | -11.37% | 4.30% | -2.03% | 56.88% | 88.62% | -38.64% | -2.82% | -18.66% | 7.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between HAL and EOG is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 1989 | 0.57 |
The correlation between HAL and EOG shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
HAL:
$33.22B
EOG:
$73.11B
HAL:
$1.82
EOG:
$10.16
HAL:
21.80
EOG:
13.45
HAL:
3.48
EOG:
1.71
HAL:
1.51
EOG:
3.15
HAL:
3.07
EOG:
2.37
HAL:
$22.17B
EOG:
$23.48B
HAL:
$3.40B
EOG:
$11.38B
HAL:
$3.83B
EOG:
$14.73B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HAL vs. EOG — Risk / Return Rank
HAL
EOG
HAL vs. EOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Halliburton Company (HAL) and EOG Resources, Inc. (EOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HAL | EOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.13 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.47 | 0.94 | +5.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.47 | 1.82 | +14.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HAL vs. EOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAL drawdown since its inception was -92.99%, which is greater than EOG's maximum drawdown of -77.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAL and EOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAL | EOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.99% | -77.13% | -15.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.10% | -18.51% | +5.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.01% | -23.72% | -30.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.01% | -33.42% | -20.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.45% | -77.13% | -14.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.89% | -8.13% | -24.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.12% | -21.97% | -17.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.14% | 9.55% | -4.41% |
Volatility
HAL vs. EOG - Volatility Comparison
Halliburton Company (HAL) has a higher volatility of 9.32% compared to EOG Resources, Inc. (EOG) at 8.72%. This indicates that HAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HAL | EOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.32% | 8.72% | +0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.13% | 21.09% | +3.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.76% | 26.17% | +10.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.18% | 32.95% | +7.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.96% | 39.13% | +6.83% |
Dividends
HAL vs. EOG - Dividend Comparison
HAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than EOG's 2.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EOG EOG Resources, Inc. | 2.95% | 3.76% | 2.97% | 4.80% | 6.79% | 5.19% | 2.83% | 1.21% | 0.87% | 0.62% | 0.66% | 0.95% |
HAL Halliburton Company | 1.72% | 2.41% | 2.50% | 1.77% | 1.22% | 0.79% | 1.67% | 2.94% | 2.71% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 2.12% |
Financials
HAL vs. EOG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Halliburton Company and EOG Resources, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HAL vs. EOG - Profitability Comparison
HAL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported a gross profit of 790.00M and revenue of 5.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.6%.
EOG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EOG Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 6.76B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
HAL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported an operating income of 679.00M and revenue of 5.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.6%.
EOG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EOG Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.60B and revenue of 6.76B, resulting in an operating margin of 38.4%.
HAL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported a net income of 461.00M and revenue of 5.40B, resulting in a net margin of 8.5%.
EOG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EOG Resources, Inc. reported a net income of 1.98B and revenue of 6.76B, resulting in a net margin of 29.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HAL and EOG have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HAL has higher volatility (9.32%) compared to EOG (8.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAL dropped -92.99% vs EOG's -77.13%.
HAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HAL and EOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer