EOG vs. LNG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about EOG Resources, Inc. (EOG) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG).

Performance

EOG vs. LNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EOG Resources, Inc. (EOG) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EOG vs. LNG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EOG EOG Resources, Inc.	35.00%	-11.37%	4.30%	-2.03%	56.88%	88.62%	-38.64%	-2.82%	-18.66%	7.47%
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc.	42.28%	-8.70%	27.18%	15.02%	49.30%	69.48%	-1.70%	3.18%	9.94%	29.95%

Fundamentals

EPS EOG : $10.15 LNG : $24.33
PE Ratio EOG : 13.84 LNG : 11.34
PEG Ratio EOG : 1.75 LNG : 0.06
PS Ratio EOG : 3.39 LNG : 3.02
Total Revenue (TTM) EOG : $22.58B LNG : $19.98B
Gross Profit (TTM) EOG : $16.50B LNG : $5.46B
EBITDA (TTM) EOG : $11.54B LNG : $9.75B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EOG achieves a 35.00% return, which is significantly lower than LNG's 42.28% return. Over the past 10 years, EOG has underperformed LNG with an annualized return of 10.29%, while LNG has yielded a comparatively higher 23.93% annualized return.

EOG

• 1D: -2.87%
• 1M: 9.15%
• YTD: 35.00%
• 6M: 28.62%
• 1Y: 12.63%
• 3Y*: 10.80%
• 5Y*: 18.94%
• 10Y*: 10.29%

LNG

• 1D: -2.79%
• 1M: 10.81%
• YTD: 42.28%
• 6M: 19.47%
• 1Y: 20.58%
• 3Y*: 21.72%
• 5Y*: 32.08%
• 10Y*: 23.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

EOG vs. LNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EOG

EOG Risk / Return Rank: 52
EOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
EOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
EOG Omega Ratio Rank: 48
EOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
EOG Martin Ratio Rank: 53

LNG

LNG Risk / Return Rank: 61
LNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
LNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
LNG Omega Ratio Rank: 58
LNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
LNG Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EOG vs. LNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EOG Resources, Inc. (EOG) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EOG	LNG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.43	0.70	-0.27
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.77	1.11	-0.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.15	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.69	0.91	-0.22
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.18	2.08	-0.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EOG vs. LNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EOG Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the LNG Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EOG and LNG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EOG	LNG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43	0.70	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57	1.08	-0.51
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.26	0.73	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.17	+0.17

Correlation

The correlation between EOG and LNG is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

EOG vs. LNG - Dividend Comparison

EOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, more than LNG's 0.76% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EOG EOG Resources, Inc.	2.84%	3.76%	2.97%	4.80%	6.79%	5.19%	2.83%	1.21%	0.87%	0.62%	0.66%	0.95%
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc.	0.76%	1.06%	0.84%	0.95%	0.92%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

EOG vs. LNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EOG drawdown since its inception was -77.13%, smaller than the maximum LNG drawdown of -97.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EOG and LNG.

Drawdown Indicators

	EOG	LNG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.13%	-97.84%	+20.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.55%	-22.34%	+2.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.42%	-24.87%	-8.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-77.13%	-57.53%	-19.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.32%	-7.10%	+0.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.04%	-43.34%	+21.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.45%	9.79%	+1.66%

Volatility

EOG vs. LNG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for EOG Resources, Inc. (EOG) is 8.23%, while Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) has a volatility of 11.79%. This indicates that EOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EOG	LNG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.23%	11.79%	-3.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.03%	18.41%	-0.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.84%	29.65%	+0.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.35%	29.90%	+3.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.14%	32.96%	+6.18%

Financials

EOG vs. LNG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between EOG Resources, Inc. and Cheniere Energy, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

EOG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, EOG Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.55B and revenue of 5.73B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.9%.

LNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

EOG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, EOG Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.84B and revenue of 5.73B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.0%.

LNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.74B and revenue of 5.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 83.7%.

EOG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, EOG Resources, Inc. reported a net income of 1.47B and revenue of 5.73B, resulting in a net margin of 25.7%.

LNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 2.30B and revenue of 5.67B, resulting in a net margin of 40.6%.