PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EOG vs. SJM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EOG vs. SJM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EOG Resources, Inc. (EOG) and The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EOG achieves a 34.26% return, which is significantly higher than SJM's 4.90% return. Over the past 10 years, EOG has outperformed SJM with an annualized return of 9.09%, while SJM has yielded a comparatively lower 0.42% annualized return.


EOG

1D
1.43%
1M
-0.27%
YTD
34.26%
6M
29.27%
1Y
28.90%
3Y*
11.23%
5Y*
15.36%
10Y*
9.09%

SJM

1D
-0.14%
1M
4.76%
YTD
4.90%
6M
1.59%
1Y
-6.55%
3Y*
-8.89%
5Y*
-2.85%
10Y*
0.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EOG vs. SJM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EOG
EOG Resources, Inc.
34.26%-11.37%4.30%-2.03%56.88%88.62%-38.64%-2.82%-18.66%7.47%
SJM
The J. M. Smucker Company
4.90%-7.56%-9.61%-17.79%20.06%21.05%14.50%14.90%-22.58%-0.49%

Correlation

The correlation between EOG and SJM is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 1994

0.15

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EOG:

$74.14B

SJM:

$10.72B

EPS

EOG:

$10.16

SJM:

-$11.77

PS Ratio

EOG:

3.19

SJM:

1.20

PB Ratio

EOG:

2.40

SJM:

2.05

Total Revenue (TTM)

EOG:

$23.48B

SJM:

$8.93B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EOG:

$11.38B

SJM:

$3.00B

EBITDA (TTM)

EOG:

$14.73B

SJM:

-$291.90M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EOG vs. SJM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EOG
EOG Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
EOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
EOG Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
EOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
EOG Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

SJM
SJM Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
SJM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SJM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
SJM Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
SJM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SJM Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EOG vs. SJM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EOG Resources, Inc. (EOG) and The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EOGSJMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.11

-0.22

+1.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.62

-0.10

+1.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

0.99

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

-0.31

+2.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.40

-0.70

+4.10

EOG vs. SJM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EOG Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is higher than the SJM Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EOG and SJM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EOGSJMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.11

-0.22

+1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

-0.12

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

0.02

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.31

+0.03

Drawdowns

EOG vs. SJM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EOG drawdown since its inception was -77.13%, which is greater than SJM's maximum drawdown of -45.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EOG and SJM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EOGSJMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.13%

-45.67%

-31.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.51%

-22.82%

+4.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.72%

-35.35%

+11.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.42%

-38.11%

+4.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.13%

-38.11%

-39.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.83%

-29.78%

+22.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.98%

-13.47%

-8.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.47%

10.00%

-0.53%

Volatility

EOG vs. SJM - Volatility Comparison

EOG Resources, Inc. (EOG) has a higher volatility of 9.35% compared to The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM) at 6.53%. This indicates that EOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SJM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EOGSJMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.35%

6.53%

+2.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.73%

17.82%

+2.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.19%

29.75%

-3.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.91%

23.78%

+9.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.17%

24.32%

+14.85%

Dividends

EOG vs. SJM - Dividend Comparison

EOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, less than SJM's 4.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EOG
EOG Resources, Inc.
2.91%3.76%2.97%4.80%6.79%5.19%2.83%1.21%0.87%0.62%0.66%0.95%
SJM
The J. M. Smucker Company
4.38%4.46%3.89%3.29%2.54%2.78%3.08%3.32%3.49%2.46%2.22%2.12%

Financials

EOG vs. SJM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EOG Resources, Inc. and The J. M. Smucker Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
6.76B
2.34B
(EOG) Total Revenue
(SJM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EOG vs. SJM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between EOG Resources, Inc. and The J. M. Smucker Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
39.2%
Portfolio components
EOG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EOG Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 6.76B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

SJM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The J. M. Smucker Company reported a gross profit of 915.80M and revenue of 2.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.2%.

EOG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EOG Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.60B and revenue of 6.76B, resulting in an operating margin of 38.4%.

SJM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The J. M. Smucker Company reported an operating income of -548.40M and revenue of 2.34B, resulting in an operating margin of -23.4%.

EOG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EOG Resources, Inc. reported a net income of 1.98B and revenue of 6.76B, resulting in a net margin of 29.3%.

SJM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The J. M. Smucker Company reported a net income of -724.20M and revenue of 2.34B, resulting in a net margin of -31.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EOG and SJM have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EOG has higher volatility (9.35%) compared to SJM (6.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EOG dropped -77.13% vs SJM's -45.67%.

EOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EOG and SJM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer