HACK vs. TRUT
HACK (ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF) and TRUT (Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. HACK is passively managed, while TRUT is actively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HACK charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for TRUT.
Performance
HACK vs. TRUT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HACK achieves a 25.84% return, which is significantly higher than TRUT's 23.56% return.
HACK
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- 20.74%
- YTD
- 25.84%
- 6M
- 20.06%
- 1Y
- 20.71%
- 3Y*
- 27.32%
- 5Y*
- 11.58%
- 10Y*
- 15.72%
TRUT
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- 13.28%
- YTD
- 23.56%
- 6M
- 22.25%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HACK vs. TRUT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HACK ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF | 25.84% | -2.09% |
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 23.56% | 10.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between HACK and TRUT is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HACK vs. TRUT — Risk / Return Rank
HACK
TRUT
HACK vs. TRUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HACK | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.42 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HACK | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 2.25 | -1.68 |
Drawdowns
HACK vs. TRUT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HACK drawdown since its inception was -42.68%, which is greater than TRUT's maximum drawdown of -18.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HACK and TRUT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HACK | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.68% | -18.55% | -24.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.01% | -2.83% | -1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.63% | -5.16% | -6.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.58% | — | — |
Volatility
HACK vs. TRUT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HACK | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.82% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.54% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.47% | 21.54% | +3.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.18% | 21.54% | +2.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.27% | 21.54% | +1.73% |
HACK vs. TRUT - Expense Ratio Comparison
HACK has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUT's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
HACK vs. TRUT - Dividend Comparison
HACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than TRUT's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HACK ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF | 0.06% | 0.07% | 0.14% | 0.20% | 0.24% | 0.26% | 1.11% | 0.14% | 0.09% | 0.01% | 1.23% |
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 0.19% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HACK and TRUT have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for HACK.
TRUT has the higher dividend yield at 0.19%, compared with 0.06% for HACK.
They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for HACK and 0.13% for TRUT.
Find the right allocation for HACK and TRUT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer