PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRUT vs. MAGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRUT vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRUT achieves a 16.13% return, which is significantly higher than MAGS's -4.28% return.


TRUT

1D
-3.32%
1M
-1.31%
YTD
16.13%
6M
14.91%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MAGS

1D
-1.37%
1M
-8.97%
YTD
-4.28%
6M
-5.96%
1Y
18.84%
3Y*
29.20%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRUT vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TRUT
Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF
16.13%9.76%
MAGS
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
-4.28%14.06%

Correlation

The correlation between TRUT and MAGS is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025

0.78

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRUT vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRUT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


MAGS
MAGS Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
MAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRUT vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRUTMAGSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.34

TRUT vs. MAGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRUT vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRUT drawdown since its inception was -18.55%, smaller than the maximum MAGS drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRUT and MAGS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRUTMAGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.55%

-29.91%

+11.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.67%

-11.00%

+2.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.27%

-4.75%

-0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.65%

Volatility

TRUT vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRUTMAGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.21%

20.74%

+2.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.21%

26.02%

-2.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.21%

26.02%

-2.81%

TRUT vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRUT has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than MAGS's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRUT vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison

TRUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than MAGS's 1.55% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
MAGS
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
1.55%1.48%0.81%0.44%
TRUT
Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF
0.20%0.14%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRUT and MAGS have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for MAGS.

MAGS has the higher dividend yield at 1.55%, compared with 0.20% for TRUT.

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for TRUT and 0.29% for MAGS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRUT and MAGS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer