HACK vs. KROP
HACK (ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF) and KROP (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - HACK tracks the Prime Cyber Defense Index while KROP tracks the Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HACK returned 27.72%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for KROP. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HACK charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for KROP.
Performance
HACK vs. KROP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HACK achieves a 27.17% return, which is significantly higher than KROP's 16.34% return.
HACK
- 1D
- -3.00%
- 1M
- 24.54%
- YTD
- 27.17%
- 6M
- 21.31%
- 1Y
- 21.52%
- 3Y*
- 27.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.82%
- 10Y*
- 15.84%
KROP
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 16.34%
- 6M
- 14.63%
- 1Y
- 13.67%
- 3Y*
- 0.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HACK vs. KROP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HACK ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF | 27.17% | 7.97% | 23.49% | 37.44% | -28.16% | 0.88% |
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF | 16.34% | 7.95% | -8.74% | -23.86% | -27.23% | -18.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between HACK and KROP is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2021 | 0.45 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HACK and KROP has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
HACK vs. KROP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HACK
KROP
Technology
-
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
HACK
KROP
-
Industrials
HACK
KROP
Financial Services
HACK
KROP
-
Basic Materials
HACK
-
KROP
Communication Services
HACK
-
KROP
-
Consumer Cyclical
HACK
-
KROP
Consumer Defensive
HACK
-
KROP
Energy
HACK
-
KROP
-
Healthcare
HACK
-
KROP
Real Estate
HACK
-
KROP
-
Utilities
HACK
-
KROP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HACK vs. KROP — Risk / Return Rank
HACK
KROP
HACK vs. KROP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HACK | KROP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.16 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | 1.22 | -0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.52 | 2.75 | -0.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HACK | KROP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 0.86 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | -0.57 | +1.15 |
Drawdowns
HACK vs. KROP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HACK drawdown since its inception was -42.68%, smaller than the maximum KROP drawdown of -61.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HACK and KROP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HACK | KROP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.68% | -61.96% | +19.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.67% | -11.29% | -9.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.90% | -28.70% | +6.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.00% | -49.05% | +46.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.63% | -44.50% | +32.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.58% | 4.99% | +3.59% |
Volatility
HACK vs. KROP - Volatility Comparison
ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) has a higher volatility of 10.68% compared to Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) at 4.77%. This indicates that HACK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HACK | KROP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.68% | 4.77% | +5.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.52% | 12.01% | +9.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.47% | 16.04% | +9.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.18% | 22.28% | +1.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.27% | 22.28% | +0.99% |
HACK vs. KROP - Expense Ratio Comparison
HACK has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than KROP's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
HACK vs. KROP - Dividend Comparison
HACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than KROP's 2.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HACK ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF | 0.06% | 0.07% | 0.14% | 0.20% | 0.24% | 0.26% | 1.11% | 0.14% | 0.09% | 0.01% | 1.23% |
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF | 2.35% | 2.73% | 1.89% | 1.36% | 0.71% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HACK and KROP have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HACK has higher volatility (10.68%) compared to KROP (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HACK dropped -42.68% vs KROP's -61.96%.
On 3-year performance, HACK leads with 27.72% vs 0.81% for KROP. On fees, KROP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, KROP has been the lower-risk option at 4.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HACK has performed better with a 27.72% return vs 0.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KROP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for HACK.
KROP has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 0.06% for HACK.
HACK tracks Prime Cyber Defense Index, while KROP tracks Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for HACK and 0.50% for KROP.
KROP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HACK and KROP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer