KROP vs. CF
KROP (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index, while CF (CF Industries Holdings, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, KROP returned 0.81%/yr vs 25.68%/yr for CF. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KROP vs. CF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KROP achieves a 16.34% return, which is significantly lower than CF's 52.19% return.
KROP
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 16.34%
- 6M
- 14.63%
- 1Y
- 13.67%
- 3Y*
- 0.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CF
- 1D
- 2.75%
- 1M
- -7.00%
- YTD
- 52.19%
- 6M
- 48.44%
- 1Y
- 29.01%
- 3Y*
- 25.68%
- 5Y*
- 18.55%
- 10Y*
- 18.28%
KROP vs. CF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF | 16.34% | 7.95% | -8.74% | -23.86% | -27.23% | -18.75% |
CF CF Industries Holdings, Inc. | 52.19% | -7.17% | 10.08% | -4.75% | 22.29% | 44.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between KROP and CF is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2021 | 0.36 |
The correlation between KROP and CF shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KROP vs. CF — Risk / Return Rank
KROP
CF
KROP vs. CF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) and CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KROP | CF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.15 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 1.17 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.75 | 2.09 | +0.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KROP | CF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 0.70 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.57 | 0.47 | -1.04 |
Drawdowns
KROP vs. CF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KROP drawdown since its inception was -61.96%, smaller than the maximum CF drawdown of -76.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KROP and CF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KROP | CF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.96% | -76.73% | +14.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.29% | -24.87% | +13.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.70% | -29.16% | +0.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -48.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -60.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.05% | -14.92% | -34.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.50% | -24.94% | -19.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.99% | 13.92% | -8.93% |
Volatility
KROP vs. CF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) is 4.77%, while CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) has a volatility of 15.00%. This indicates that KROP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KROP | CF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.77% | 15.00% | -10.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.01% | 35.09% | -23.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.04% | 41.88% | -25.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.28% | 38.16% | -15.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.28% | 40.41% | -18.13% |
Dividends
KROP vs. CF - Dividend Comparison
KROP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, more than CF's 1.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CF CF Industries Holdings, Inc. | 1.72% | 2.59% | 2.34% | 2.01% | 1.76% | 1.70% | 3.10% | 2.51% | 2.76% | 2.82% | 3.81% | 2.94% |
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF | 2.35% | 2.73% | 1.89% | 1.36% | 0.71% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KROP and CF have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CF has higher volatility (15.00%) compared to KROP (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KROP dropped -61.96% vs CF's -76.73%.
KROP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KROP and CF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer