HACK vs. BWET

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

HACK (Amplify Cybersecurity ETF) and BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HACK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq ISE Cyber Security Select Index, while BWET is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HACK returned 25.16%/yr vs 123.86%/yr for BWET. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. HACK charges 0.60%/yr vs 3.50%/yr for BWET.

Performance

HACK vs. BWET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HACK achieves a 19.40% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 968.33% return.

HACK

• 1D: 1.24%
• 1M: 1.17%
• YTD: 19.40%
• 6M: 17.34%
• 1Y: 14.12%
• 3Y*: 25.16%
• 5Y*: 9.42%
• 10Y*: 15.64%

BWET

• 1D: -5.48%
• 1M: 18.43%
• YTD: 968.33%
• 6M: 944.72%
• 1Y: 1,424.52%
• 3Y*: 123.86%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HACK vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
HACK Amplify Cybersecurity ETF	19.40%	7.97%	23.49%	39.01%
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	968.33%	96.22%	-39.21%	14.13%

Correlation

The correlation between HACK and BWET is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2023	-0.04

Return for Risk

HACK vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HACK

HACK Risk / Return Rank: 17
HACK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
HACK Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
HACK Omega Ratio Rank: 17
HACK Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
HACK Martin Ratio Rank: 16

BWET

BWET Risk / Return Rank: 98
BWET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BWET Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BWET Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HACK vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HACK	BWET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.55	14.65	-14.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.90	6.07	-5.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.87	-0.76
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.69	47.03	-46.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.61	147.28	-145.67

HACK vs. BWET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HACK Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the BWET Sharpe Ratio of 14.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HACK and BWET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HACK vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HACK drawdown since its inception was -42.68%, smaller than the maximum BWET drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HACK and BWET.

Drawdown Indicators

	HACK	BWET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.68%	-56.90%	+14.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.67%	-30.64%	+9.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.90%	-56.81%	+34.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.68%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.93%	-5.48%	-3.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.62%	-23.76%	+12.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.80%	11.60%	-2.80%

Volatility

HACK vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) is 11.83%, while Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a volatility of 26.27%. This indicates that HACK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HACK	BWET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.83%	26.27%	-14.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.94%	89.01%	-67.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.06%	98.57%	-72.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.30%	70.47%	-46.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.25%	70.47%	-47.22%

HACK vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison

HACK has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

HACK vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison

HACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, while BWET has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HACK Amplify Cybersecurity ETF	0.06%	0.07%	0.14%	0.20%	0.24%	0.26%	1.11%	0.14%	0.09%	0.01%	1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HACK and BWET in my portfolio?

HACK and BWET have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HACK or BWET?

BWET has higher volatility (26.27%) compared to HACK (11.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HACK dropped -42.68% vs BWET's -56.90%.

Which ETF is better, HACK or BWET?

On 3-year performance, BWET leads with 123.86% vs 25.16% for HACK. On fees, HACK is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, HACK has been the lower-risk option at 11.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HACK or BWET?

Over the 3-year period, BWET has performed better with a 123.86% return vs 25.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HACK or BWET?

HACK is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HACK or BWET?

HACK has the higher dividend yield at 0.06%, compared with 0.00% for BWET.

What is the main difference between HACK and BWET?

HACK is categorized as Technology Equities, while BWET is Commodities. HACK tracks Nasdaq ISE Cyber Security Select Index, while BWET tracks Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for HACK and 3.50% for BWET.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.65 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.