BWET vs. ISCMF

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) and ISCMF (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both Commodities funds - BWET tracks the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index while ISCMF tracks the Bloomberg Commodity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BWET returned 126.47%/yr vs 15.20%/yr for ISCMF. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. BWET charges 3.50%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ISCMF.

Performance

BWET vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BWET achieves a 835.99% return, which is significantly higher than ISCMF's 22.87% return.

BWET

• 1D: 8.73%
• 1M: 3.52%
• YTD: 835.99%
• 6M: 698.56%
• 1Y: 1,645.55%
• 3Y*: 126.47%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ISCMF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.67%
• YTD: 22.87%
• 6M: 27.76%
• 1Y: 37.85%
• 3Y*: 15.20%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BWET vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	835.99%	96.22%	-39.21%	15.94%
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF	22.87%	19.65%	3.13%	-0.08%

Correlation

The correlation between BWET and ISCMF is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2023	-0.01

Return for Risk

BWET vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BWET

BWET Risk / Return Rank: 98
BWET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BWET Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BWET Martin Ratio Rank: 99

ISCMF

ISCMF Risk / Return Rank: 82
ISCMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
ISCMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
ISCMF Omega Ratio Rank: 99
ISCMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
ISCMF Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BWET vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BWET	ISCMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	16.94	2.05	+14.89
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	6.37	3.74	+2.64
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.93	2.53	-0.60
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	51.48	6.66	+44.82
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	137.13	15.79	+121.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BWET vs. ISCMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BWET Sharpe Ratio is 16.94, which is higher than the ISCMF Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BWET and ISCMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BWET	ISCMF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.94	2.05	+14.89
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.86	0.45	+1.40

Drawdowns

BWET vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BWET drawdown since its inception was -56.90%, which is greater than ISCMF's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWET and ISCMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	BWET	ISCMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.90%	-25.42%	-31.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.64%	-5.69%	-24.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-56.90%	-7.62%	-49.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.91%	-5.26%	-9.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.10%	-13.44%	-10.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.50%	2.40%	+9.10%

Volatility

BWET vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison

Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a higher volatility of 33.76% compared to iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) at 7.14%. This indicates that BWET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BWET	ISCMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	33.76%	7.14%	+26.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	88.46%	15.90%	+72.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	98.44%	18.53%	+79.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	70.46%	14.38%	+56.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	70.46%	14.38%	+56.08%

BWET vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

BWET has a 3.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

BWET vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison

Neither BWET nor ISCMF has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BWET and ISCMF in my portfolio?

BWET and ISCMF have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BWET or ISCMF?

BWET has higher volatility (33.76%) compared to ISCMF (7.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BWET dropped -56.90% vs ISCMF's -25.42%.

Which ETF is better, BWET or ISCMF?

On 3-year performance, BWET leads with 126.47% vs 15.20% for ISCMF. On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ISCMF has been the lower-risk option at 7.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BWET or ISCMF?

Over the 3-year period, BWET has performed better with a 126.47% return vs 15.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BWET or ISCMF?

ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BWET or ISCMF?

BWET and ISCMF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BWET and ISCMF?

BWET tracks Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index, while ISCMF tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 3.50% for BWET and 0.19% for ISCMF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (16.94 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.