BWET vs. ISCMF
Compare and contrast key facts about Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF).
BWET and ISCMF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BWET is a passively managed fund by Amplify that tracks the performance of the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. It was launched on May 3, 2023. ISCMF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Commodity Index. It was launched on Mar 4, 2022. Both BWET and ISCMF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BWET vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BWET vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF | 503.80% | 96.22% | -39.21% | 15.94% |
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 17.84% | 19.65% | 3.13% | -0.08% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BWET achieves a 503.80% return, which is significantly higher than ISCMF's 17.84% return.
BWET
- 1D
- 18.09%
- 1M
- 58.86%
- YTD
- 503.80%
- 6M
- 756.55%
- 1Y
- 976.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISCMF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 7.22%
- YTD
- 17.84%
- 6M
- 26.76%
- 1Y
- 29.86%
- 3Y*
- 12.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BWET vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
BWET has a 3.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BWET vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank
BWET
ISCMF
BWET vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BWET | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 11.64 | 1.79 | +9.85 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 6.21 | 3.44 | +2.77 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.92 | 2.36 | -0.43 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 33.50 | 5.25 | +28.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 94.71 | 12.35 | +82.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BWET | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.64 | 1.79 | +9.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.66 | 0.40 | +1.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between BWET and ISCMF is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
BWET vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison
Neither BWET nor ISCMF has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
BWET vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BWET drawdown since its inception was -56.90%, which is greater than ISCMF's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWET and ISCMF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BWET | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.90% | -25.42% | -31.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.84% | -5.69% | -23.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.91% | -2.55% | -2.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.71% | -13.97% | -10.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.20% | 2.42% | +7.78% |
Volatility
BWET vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison
Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a higher volatility of 51.29% compared to iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) at 9.72%. This indicates that BWET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BWET | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 51.29% | 9.72% | +41.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 74.48% | 13.85% | +60.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 84.73% | 16.72% | +68.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.29% | 14.05% | +51.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.29% | 14.05% | +51.24% |