GXTG vs. IBIC
GXTG (Global X Thematic Growth ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GXTG is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive Thematic Growth Index, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GXTG returned -4.66% vs 4.02% for IBIC. Their 0.00 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GXTG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.
Performance
GXTG vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXTG achieves a 1.80% return, which is significantly lower than IBIC's 2.67% return.
GXTG
- 1D
- 3.13%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- 6M
- -0.36%
- YTD
- 1.80%
- 1Y
- -4.66%
- 3Y*
- -2.08%
- 5Y*
- -12.79%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.19%
IBIC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- 6M
- 2.37%
- YTD
- 2.67%
- 1Y
- 4.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.24%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $123.03K | $106.22K | $198.85K | |
| $1.04M | $809.24K | $530.96K |
GXTG vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 1.80% | 3.52% | -3.55% | -1.88% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 2.67% | 4.96% | 5.25% | 2.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXTG and IBIC is -0.16, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023 | 0.00 |
The correlation between GXTG and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXTG vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank
GXTG
IBIC
GXTG vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GXTG | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -8.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 2.09 | -1.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.16 | 15.07 | -15.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.37 | 51.54 | -51.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXTG vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXTG drawdown since its inception was -67.81%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXTG and IBIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXTG | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.81% | -0.90% | -66.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.14% | -0.27% | -28.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.76% | -0.08% | -59.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.43% | -0.10% | -43.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.71% | 0.08% | +12.63% |
Volatility
GXTG vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison
Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) has a higher volatility of 13.53% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.23%. This indicates that GXTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXTG | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.53% | 0.23% | +13.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.87% | 0.69% | +25.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.66% | 0.89% | +30.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.78% | 1.54% | +27.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.15% | 1.54% | +28.61% |
GXTG vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXTG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXTG vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison
GXTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than IBIC's 4.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 1.47% | 1.40% | 1.08% | 1.99% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 0.48% | 0.31% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 4.62% | 4.43% | 4.65% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXTG and IBIC have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GXTG has higher volatility (13.53%) compared to IBIC (0.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GXTG dropped -67.81% vs IBIC's -0.90%.
On 1-year performance, IBIC leads with 4.02% vs -4.66% for GXTG. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBIC has performed better with a 4.02% return vs -4.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GXTG.
IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 1.47% for GXTG.
GXTG is categorized as Global Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. GXTG tracks Solactive Thematic Growth Index, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GXTG and 0.10% for IBIC.
IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.57 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GXTG and IBIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer