PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBIC vs. RBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IBIC vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IBIC vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBIC achieves a 1.45% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 1.65% return.


IBIC

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.86%
YTD
1.45%
6M
2.09%
1Y
4.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RBIL

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.03%
YTD
1.65%
6M
2.23%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IBIC vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBIC has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

IBIC vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

RBIL
RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBIC vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBICRBILDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.71

3.76

-0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

6.38

6.07

+0.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.91

2.00

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

8.93

7.98

+0.95

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

32.20

35.17

-2.97

IBIC vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBIC Sharpe Ratio is 3.71, which is comparable to the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 3.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBIC and RBIL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBICRBILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.71

3.76

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.42

4.10

-0.67

Correlation

The correlation between IBIC and RBIL is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

IBIC vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

IBIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, less than RBIL's 4.42% yield.


Drawdowns

IBIC vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBIC drawdown since its inception was -0.90%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIC and RBIL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IBICRBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.90%

-0.50%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.46%

-0.50%

+0.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-0.08%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.10%

-0.06%

-0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.13%

0.11%

+0.02%

Volatility

IBIC vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) is 0.37%, while F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) has a volatility of 0.58%. This indicates that IBIC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IBICRBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.37%

0.58%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.62%

0.67%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16%

1.04%

+0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.61%

1.03%

+0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.61%

1.03%

+0.58%