PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COPX vs. REMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COPX vs. REMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COPX achieves a 10.22% return, which is significantly higher than REMX's -10.75% return. Over the past 10 years, COPX has outperformed REMX with an annualized return of 18.83%, while REMX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.76% annualized return.


COPX

1D
-0.81%
1M
2.88%
6M
-6.70%
YTD
10.22%
1Y
89.44%
3Y*
27.01%
5Y*
18.54%
10Y*
18.83%
ALL TIME*
5.76%

REMX

1D
-0.72%
1M
-23.93%
6M
-22.96%
YTD
-10.75%
1Y
36.09%
3Y*
-4.84%
5Y*
-7.48%
10Y*
5.76%
ALL TIME*
-5.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$193.89M$197.23M$300.83M
$50.08M$56.30M$87.87M

COPX vs. REMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
10.22%93.50%3.57%8.38%-0.76%23.39%51.66%12.48%-31.31%38.92%
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
-10.75%92.95%-35.02%-19.18%-31.13%79.81%64.82%0.74%-49.63%82.60%

Correlation

The correlation between COPX and REMX is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2010

0.68

The correlation between COPX and REMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

COPX vs. REMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
COPX
REMX

Basic Materials

96.9%
100.0%

Industrials

3.1%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

COPX
96.9%
REMX
100.0%

Industrials

COPX
3.1%
REMX

-

Communication Services

COPX

-

REMX

-

Consumer Cyclical

COPX

-

REMX

-

Consumer Defensive

COPX

-

REMX

-

Energy

COPX

-

REMX

-

Financial Services

COPX

-

REMX

-

Healthcare

COPX

-

REMX

-

Real Estate

COPX

-

REMX

-

Technology

COPX

-

REMX

-

Utilities

COPX

-

REMX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COPX vs. REMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

COPX
COPX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
COPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
COPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
COPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
COPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

REMX
REMX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
REMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
REMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
REMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
REMX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

COPX vs. REMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COPXREMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.15

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

0.89

+2.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.96

2.75

+5.21

COPX vs. REMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the REMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COPX and REMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COPX vs. REMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COPX drawdown since its inception was -83.16%, smaller than the maximum REMX drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPX and REMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COPXREMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.16%

-90.20%

+7.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.82%

-41.03%

+13.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.72%

-58.11%

+18.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.12%

-73.34%

+31.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.41%

-73.34%

+7.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.32%

-69.79%

+52.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.11%

-66.81%

+27.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.11%

13.28%

-2.17%

Volatility

COPX vs. REMX - Volatility Comparison

Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has a higher volatility of 13.58% compared to VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) at 11.77%. This indicates that COPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COPXREMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.58%

11.77%

+1.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.74%

37.31%

+2.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.77%

49.87%

-4.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.28%

40.57%

-3.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.87%

37.30%

-1.43%

COPX vs. REMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

COPX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than REMX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

COPX vs. REMX - Dividend Comparison

COPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, more than REMX's 1.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
2.45%2.68%1.80%2.39%3.14%1.48%1.30%1.37%2.59%1.57%0.60%1.20%
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
1.97%1.76%2.56%0.00%1.56%5.25%0.81%1.64%12.43%2.89%2.23%4.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


COPX and REMX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COPX has higher volatility (13.58%) compared to REMX (11.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COPX dropped -83.16% vs REMX's -90.20%.

On 10-year performance, COPX leads with 18.83% vs 5.76% for REMX. On fees, REMX is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, REMX has been the lower-risk option at 11.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, COPX has performed better with a 18.83% return vs 5.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

REMX is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for COPX.

COPX has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 1.97% for REMX.

COPX is categorized as Copper, while REMX is Rare Earth & Strategic Metals. COPX tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index, while REMX tracks MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for COPX and 0.59% for REMX.

COPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COPX and REMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer