GXPT vs. XLK
GXPT (Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - GXPT tracks the MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index while XLK tracks the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GXPT charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
GXPT vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXPT achieves a 24.23% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 34.34% return.
GXPT
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- 13.76%
- YTD
- 24.23%
- 6M
- 22.90%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLK
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- 16.63%
- YTD
- 34.34%
- 6M
- 33.10%
- 1Y
- 64.08%
- 3Y*
- 33.46%
- 5Y*
- 23.44%
- 10Y*
- 25.62%
GXPT vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF | 24.23% | 10.78% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 34.34% | 10.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXPT and XLK is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.97 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXPT vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
GXPT
XLK
GXPT vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GXPT | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.95 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.11 | 0.41 | +1.69 |
Drawdowns
GXPT vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXPT drawdown since its inception was -18.74%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPT and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXPT | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.74% | -82.05% | +63.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.96% | -2.54% | -0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.92% | -34.95% | +30.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.74% | — |
Volatility
GXPT vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXPT | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.76% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.23% | 20.86% | +0.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.23% | 24.90% | -3.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.23% | 24.49% | -3.26% |
GXPT vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXPT has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GXPT vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
GXPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than XLK's 0.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF | 0.11% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.40% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, GXPT and XLK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for GXPT.
XLK has the higher dividend yield at 0.40%, compared with 0.11% for GXPT.
GXPT tracks MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXPT and 0.08% for XLK.
Find the right allocation for GXPT and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer