PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXPT vs. QTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXPT vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXPT achieves a 16.86% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 49.25% return.


GXPT

1D
-3.44%
1M
-0.96%
YTD
16.86%
6M
15.57%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QTUM

1D
-3.12%
1M
6.45%
YTD
49.25%
6M
46.84%
1Y
87.39%
3Y*
51.19%
5Y*
28.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXPT vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GXPT
Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF
16.86%11.47%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
49.25%17.59%

Correlation

The correlation between GXPT and QTUM is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025

0.79

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXPT vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GXPT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


QTUM
QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXPT vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GXPTQTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.75

GXPT vs. QTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GXPT vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXPT drawdown since its inception was -18.74%, smaller than the maximum QTUM drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPT and QTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXPTQTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.74%

-38.45%

+19.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.72%

-3.21%

-5.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.04%

-8.22%

+3.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.23%

Volatility

GXPT vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXPTQTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.91%

29.10%

-6.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.91%

27.17%

-4.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.91%

27.48%

-4.57%

GXPT vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXPT has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

GXPT vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison

GXPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than QTUM's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
GXPT
Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF
0.12%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
0.72%1.01%0.61%0.81%1.46%0.48%0.42%0.61%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


GXPT and QTUM have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GXPT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXPT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for QTUM.

QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.12% for GXPT.

GXPT tracks MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index, while QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXPT and 0.40% for QTUM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXPT and QTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer