GXPT vs. MARS
GXPT (Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF) and MARS (Roundhill Space & Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. GXPT is passively managed, while MARS is actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GXPT charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for MARS.
Performance
GXPT vs. MARS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GXPT
- 1D
- -3.44%
- 1M
- -0.96%
- YTD
- 16.86%
- 6M
- 15.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MARS
- 1D
- -2.21%
- 1M
- -26.92%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXPT vs. MARS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF | 22.91% |
MARS Roundhill Space & Technology ETF | 18.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXPT and MARS is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2026 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXPT vs. MARS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT) and Roundhill Space & Technology ETF (MARS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXPT vs. MARS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXPT drawdown since its inception was -18.74%, smaller than the maximum MARS drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPT and MARS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXPT | MARS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.74% | -33.89% | +15.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.72% | -33.89% | +25.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.04% | -7.31% | +2.27% |
Volatility
GXPT vs. MARS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXPT | MARS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.91% | 67.75% | -44.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.91% | 67.75% | -44.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.91% | 67.75% | -44.84% |
GXPT vs. MARS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXPT has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MARS's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXPT vs. MARS - Dividend Comparison
GXPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, while MARS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF | 0.12% | 0.14% |
MARS Roundhill Space & Technology ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXPT and MARS have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for MARS.
GXPT has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.00% for MARS.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXPT and 0.75% for MARS.
Find the right allocation for GXPT and MARS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer