MARS vs. WARP
MARS (Roundhill Space & Technology ETF) and WARP (VanEck Space ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MARS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while WARP is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MarketVector Space Index. MARS is actively managed, while WARP is passively managed. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MARS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for WARP.
Performance
MARS vs. WARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MARS
- 1D
- -6.85%
- 1M
- 20.13%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WARP
- 1D
- -6.84%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MARS vs. WARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MARS Roundhill Space & Technology ETF | 20.41% |
WARP VanEck Space ETF | 23.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between MARS and WARP is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2026 | 0.99 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MARS vs. WARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Space & Technology ETF (MARS) and VanEck Space ETF (WARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MARS | WARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 6.31 | 22.26 | -15.96 |
Drawdowns
MARS vs. WARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MARS drawdown since its inception was -19.50%, roughly equal to the maximum WARP drawdown of -18.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARS and WARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MARS | WARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.50% | -18.67% | -0.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.50% | -18.67% | -0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.31% | -3.23% | -0.08% |
Volatility
MARS vs. WARP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MARS | WARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.89% | 83.83% | -20.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.89% | 83.83% | -20.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.89% | 83.83% | -20.94% |
MARS vs. WARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
MARS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than WARP's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
MARS vs. WARP - Dividend Comparison
Neither MARS nor WARP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, MARS and WARP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, WARP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WARP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for MARS.
MARS and WARP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
MARS is categorized as Technology Equities, while WARP is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for MARS and 0.50% for WARP.
Find the right allocation for MARS and WARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer