GGTL vs. GBHI
GGTL (Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF) and GBHI (Gabelli High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GGTL is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli, while GBHI is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Gabelli. Both are actively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GGTL charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for GBHI.
Performance
GGTL vs. GBHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGTL achieves a 21.20% return, which is significantly higher than GBHI's 1.77% return.
GGTL
- 1D
- -5.78%
- 1M
- 5.30%
- YTD
- 21.20%
- 6M
- 21.08%
- 1Y
- 40.24%
- 3Y*
- 21.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GBHI
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- YTD
- 1.77%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GGTL vs. GBHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GGTL Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF | 21.20% | 1.29% |
GBHI Gabelli High Income ETF | 1.77% | 1.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between GGTL and GBHI is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GGTL vs. GBHI — Risk / Return Rank
GGTL
GBHI
GGTL vs. GBHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF (GGTL) and Gabelli High Income ETF (GBHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GGTL | GBHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.40 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.24 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GGTL | GBHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 1.73 | -1.09 |
Drawdowns
GGTL vs. GBHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGTL drawdown since its inception was -23.65%, which is greater than GBHI's maximum drawdown of -2.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGTL and GBHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGTL | GBHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.65% | -2.12% | -21.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.04% | -0.43% | -5.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.43% | -0.27% | -7.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.48% | — | — |
Volatility
GGTL vs. GBHI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GGTL | GBHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.93% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.90% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.83% | 3.34% | +14.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.89% | 3.34% | +14.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.89% | 3.34% | +14.55% |
GGTL vs. GBHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
GGTL has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than GBHI's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
GGTL vs. GBHI - Dividend Comparison
GGTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than GBHI's 1.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBHI Gabelli High Income ETF | 1.85% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GGTL Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF | 0.86% | 1.04% | 0.75% | 0.84% | 0.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GGTL and GBHI have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GBHI is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GBHI is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for GGTL.
GBHI has the higher dividend yield at 1.85%, compared with 0.86% for GGTL.
GGTL is categorized as Technology Equities, while GBHI is High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for GGTL and 0.55% for GBHI.
Find the right allocation for GGTL and GBHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer