GGTL vs. KDVD
GGTL (Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF) and KDVD (Keeley Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GGTL is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli, while KDVD is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli. Both are actively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GGTL charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for KDVD.
Performance
GGTL vs. KDVD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGTL achieves a 22.19% return, which is significantly higher than KDVD's 15.91% return.
GGTL
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- YTD
- 22.19%
- 6M
- 21.73%
- 1Y
- 36.33%
- 3Y*
- 20.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KDVD
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 4.51%
- YTD
- 15.91%
- 6M
- 14.56%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GGTL vs. KDVD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GGTL Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF | 22.19% | -0.09% |
KDVD Keeley Dividend ETF | 15.91% | -0.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between GGTL and KDVD is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GGTL vs. KDVD — Risk / Return Rank
GGTL
KDVD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GGTL vs. KDVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF (GGTL) and Keeley Dividend ETF (KDVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GGTL | KDVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.97 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.25 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GGTL vs. KDVD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGTL drawdown since its inception was -23.65%, which is greater than KDVD's maximum drawdown of -10.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGTL and KDVD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGTL | KDVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.65% | -10.98% | -12.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.91% | 0.00% | -5.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.39% | -2.70% | -4.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | — | — |
Volatility
GGTL vs. KDVD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GGTL | KDVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.93% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.05% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.59% | 14.84% | +4.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.21% | 14.84% | +3.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.21% | 14.84% | +3.37% |
GGTL vs. KDVD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GGTL has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than KDVD's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
GGTL vs. KDVD - Dividend Comparison
GGTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than KDVD's 1.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGTL Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF | 0.85% | 1.04% | 0.75% | 0.84% | 0.78% |
KDVD Keeley Dividend ETF | 1.31% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GGTL and KDVD have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KDVD is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KDVD is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for GGTL.
KDVD has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.85% for GGTL.
GGTL is categorized as Technology Equities, while KDVD is Mid Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for GGTL and 0.00% for KDVD.
Find the right allocation for GGTL and KDVD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer