GXPS vs. VGT
GXPS (Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GXPS is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Consumer Staples Index, while VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.30, they often move in opposite directions. GXPS charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VGT.
Performance
GXPS vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXPS achieves a 9.00% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 22.48% return.
GXPS
- 1D
- 1.92%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- 9.00%
- 6M
- 8.65%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VGT
- 1D
- -6.14%
- 1M
- 5.22%
- YTD
- 22.48%
- 6M
- 20.33%
- 1Y
- 49.26%
- 3Y*
- 30.47%
- 5Y*
- 20.48%
- 10Y*
- 24.81%
GXPS vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GXPS Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF | 9.00% | -1.72% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 22.48% | 10.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXPS and VGT is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | -0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXPS vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
GXPS
VGT
GXPS vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF (GXPS) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GXPS | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.66 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
GXPS vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXPS drawdown since its inception was -9.20%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPS and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXPS | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.20% | -54.63% | +45.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.38% | -8.34% | +1.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.90% | -7.95% | +4.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.15% | — |
Volatility
GXPS vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXPS | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.29% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.37% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.05% | 21.51% | -7.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.05% | 25.31% | -11.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.05% | 24.68% | -10.63% |
GXPS vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXPS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GXPS vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
GXPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, more than VGT's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXPS Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF | 0.55% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXPS and VGT have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GXPS.
GXPS has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.
GXPS is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while VGT is Technology Equities. GXPS tracks MSCI USA Consumer Staples Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GXPS and 0.09% for VGT.
Find the right allocation for GXPS and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer