GXPS vs. SMHX
GXPS (Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF) and SMHX (VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GXPS is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Consumer Staples Index, while SMHX is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MarketVector™ US Listed Fabless Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.33, they often move in opposite directions. GXPS charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMHX.
Performance
GXPS vs. SMHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXPS achieves a 11.55% return, which is significantly lower than SMHX's 48.21% return.
GXPS
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- 6M
- 5.56%
- YTD
- 11.55%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMHX
- 1D
- -4.39%
- 1M
- -9.38%
- 6M
- 43.30%
- YTD
- 48.21%
- 1Y
- 75.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXPS vs. SMHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GXPS Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF | 11.55% | -1.72% |
SMHX VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF | 48.21% | 16.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXPS and SMHX is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | -0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXPS vs. SMHX — Risk / Return Rank
GXPS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SMHX
GXPS vs. SMHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF (GXPS) and VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GXPS | SMHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.43 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.82 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXPS vs. SMHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXPS drawdown since its inception was -9.20%, smaller than the maximum SMHX drawdown of -38.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPS and SMHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXPS | SMHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.20% | -38.53% | +29.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.18% | -16.94% | +12.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.08% | -7.47% | +3.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.97% | — |
Volatility
GXPS vs. SMHX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXPS | SMHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 15.79% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 32.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.71% | 38.47% | -23.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.71% | 41.83% | -27.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.71% | 41.83% | -27.12% |
GXPS vs. SMHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXPS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SMHX's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXPS vs. SMHX - Dividend Comparison
GXPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than SMHX's 0.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GXPS Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF | 1.24% | 0.59% | 0.00% |
SMHX VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXPS and SMHX have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPS is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPS is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMHX.
GXPS has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.02% for SMHX.
GXPS is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while SMHX is Semiconductors. GXPS tracks MSCI USA Consumer Staples Index, while SMHX tracks MarketVector™ US Listed Fabless Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GXPS and 0.35% for SMHX.
Find the right allocation for GXPS and SMHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer