PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXPS vs. QYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXPS vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF (GXPS) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXPS achieves a 6.95% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 7.88% return.


GXPS

1D
-0.18%
1M
-3.77%
YTD
6.95%
6M
6.56%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QYLD

1D
0.00%
1M
1.40%
YTD
7.88%
6M
9.91%
1Y
23.70%
3Y*
13.76%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*
9.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXPS vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GXPS and QYLD is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025

-0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXPS vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GXPS

QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXPS vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF (GXPS) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GXPS vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GXPSQYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.59

-0.17

Drawdowns

GXPS vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXPS drawdown since its inception was -9.20%, smaller than the maximum QYLD drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPS and QYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXPSQYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.20%

-24.75%

+15.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.14%

-0.06%

-8.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.89%

-3.84%

-0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

Volatility

GXPS vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXPSQYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.94%

8.57%

+5.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.94%

14.70%

-0.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.94%

15.49%

-1.55%

GXPS vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXPS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

GXPS vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

GXPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than QYLD's 11.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GXPS
Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF
0.56%0.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.46%11.55%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


GXPS and QYLD have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GXPS is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXPS is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.

QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.46%, compared with 0.56% for GXPS.

GXPS is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. GXPS tracks MSCI USA Consumer Staples Index, while QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GXPS and 0.60% for QYLD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXPS and QYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer